Search for: "Rebelle v. United States" Results 21 - 40 of 349
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2016, 2:02 pm by Sandy Levinson
  Our second largest state seceded from Mexico (and then, of course, with ten other states, attempted to secede from the United States in a struggle that ultimately cost 750,000 lives (for starters). [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 7:54 am by Josh Blackman
On December 6, the Colorado Supreme Court heard oral argument in Griswold v. [read post]
17 Oct 2024, 6:34 am by Jacob Katz Cogan
European Commission, Case C-137/21, Judgment Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law The Department of State Announces Initiatives to Counter Foreign State Information Manipulation The United States Designates the Overthrow of Niger's Government a “Coup d'Etat” New Compact of Free Association Agreements with Micronesia, the Marshall Islands, and Palau Approved by Congress President… [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
  The first clause—what John Vlahoplus helpfully refers to as the “Positions Clause”—identifies the government offices and other employments that a covered rebel or insurrectionist is prohibited from “hold[ing]. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
Gill v Anagnost, Crews and Grenier (United States) A libel action brought in the New Hampshire state court concerning the posting of defamatory statements on a billboard by mortgage broker Michael Gill. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 6:05 am by Blake Van Santen
” Note: Readers may be interested in our South Africa v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 5:00 am by Amanda L. Tyler
On Dec. 11, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia heard arguments in ACLU v. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 4:11 am by Nicholas Mosvick
Just a year before Prigg in 1841, Story penned the majority opinion in United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 12:10 pm by Steven Boutwell
GIC Services, LLC contracted with Freightplus (USA), Inc. to ship a tugboat, the M/V REBEL, to Lagos, Nigeria. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 9:24 am by Jack Goldsmith
Section 413b of Title 50 defines “covert action” as “an activity or activities of the United States Government to influence political, economic, or military conditions abroad, where it is intended that the role of the United States Government will not be apparent or acknowledged publicly” (emphasis added). [read post]
21 Jun 2008, 3:16 pm
Marty asks whether this provision violates the principles of United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 3:05 pm by Marty Lederman
 That the presidency isn’t a covered “office under the United States” that rebels and insurrectionists are disqualified from holding. [read post]