Search for: "Redden v. Redden" Results 21 - 40 of 52
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jul 2011, 2:45 am by Otto Spijkers
By Otto Spijkers On the website of the Dutch Courts, you will find, in a few days, the English translation of the case in which the State of the Netherlands is held responsible for the death of three Muslim men after the fall of Srebrenica. [read post]
7 May 2011, 3:42 pm by Timothy P. Flynn
  A journalist, Eric VanDussen, sued the Court of Appeals upon being denied access to record the oral arguments in the People v Anderson case. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 7:06 pm by Timothy P. Flynn
Michigan Attorney General Bill Schuette has filed amicus briefs in two medical marijuana cases pending in Michigan appellate courts; one case is from Oakland County, the other from Isabella County.The Oakland County case, the well-known People v Redden debacle, involved whether an unregistered marijuana user could nevertheless assert the defenses set forth in the Medical Marijuana Act. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 6:14 am by Timothy P. Flynn, Esq.
Michigan Attorney General Bill Schuette has filed amicus briefs in two medical marijuana cases pending in Michigan appellate courts; one case is from Oakland County, the other from Isabella County.The Oakland County case, the well-known People v Redden debacle, involved whether an unregistered marijuana user could nevertheless assert the defenses set forth in the Medical Marijuana Act. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 11:21 am by Curt Cutting
  The labels warned about the possibility of severe allergic reactions, but didn't specifically warn about skin reddening, blisters, or rash. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 4:12 pm
Resource: Johnson and Johnson v Superior Court, Court of Appeal Second District, January 20, 2011 [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 12:10 pm by Curt Cutting
  Johnson & Johnson did warn about the possibility of severe allergic reactions, but didn't specifically warn about skin reddening, blisters, or rash. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 9:21 am by Jeanne Hannah
According to the COA, in People v Redden [For Publication, decided September 14, 2010], under the MMA, a person may not be denied custody or visitation of a minor for acting in accordance with the act unless his or her behavior is such that it creates an unreasonable danger to the minor which can be clearly articulated and substantiated. [read post]