Search for: "Redding v. Christian" Results 21 - 40 of 346
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Sep 2012, 6:25 am by Rachael Dyer
 In a decision of 5 September 2012, the 2nd US Circuit Court of Appeals in New York ruled that the red soles used in Christian Louboutin’s shoes were a "distinctive symbol that qualifies for trade mark protection" and therefore a valid and enforceable trademark. [read post]
24 May 2022, 7:06 am by Matthew David Brozik
Because in a decision in Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
Another high-profile Louboutin case, although this time it’s less about the protection of the red sole as such than the liability of online retail platforms. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 2:00 am by Howard Friedman
Supreme Court this morning will hear oral arguments in Shurtleff v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 6:04 pm by Matthew David Brozik
Because in a decision in Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 1:07 pm by Catherine M. Clayton
Earlier today, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued its long-awaited decision in Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 1:07 pm by Catherine M. Clayton
Earlier today, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued its long-awaited decision in Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 12:58 am
Spot the difference: Christian Louboutin v Zara The fashionistas out there will recall that Louboutin claims to have come up with the idea for his red-soled heels some 20 years ago when he painted red nail polish on the black soles of a pair of women's shoes [Merpel wonders whether anyone was wearing them at the time -- now, that would have made an interesting story!]. [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 2:17 pm by Erik J. Heels
Martinez, Alex Verdugo, Xander Bogaerts, Hunter Renfroe, Christian Vázquez, Kike Hernandez, Bobby Dalbec, Christian Arroyo). [read post]