Search for: "Reed v. Mai"
Results 21 - 40
of 2,089
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2024, 4:25 am
In the case of Debo v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court has opined (see, e.g., Rodriguez de Quijas v. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 12:47 pm
Supreme Court, however, held in AMG Capital Management LLC v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 2:33 pm
”[2] A case argued by Murray and attorney Dorothy Kenyon for women to have the equal right to serve on juries inspired Ruth Bader Ginsburg to the point where, when Ginsburg wrote her brief for Reed v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 5:00 am
In the case of Lamarr-Murphy v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 5:00 am
In the case of Dominiak v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
Lash's response to the Amar brothers' amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 11:00 pm
Term Limits v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:47 pm
(For those curious, Parts V and VI of our ten-part series are mostly done, though they may change depending on what happens in Trump v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 5:00 am
In the case of Ziadeh v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:58 pm
Although California was an early trendsetter in this area, with the decision in Buss v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 5:16 am
Reed Smith will continue to follow developments related to OUD and treatment at OTPs. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 5:57 pm
The privilege of membership in a party may be, as this Court said in Grovey v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 8:09 am
Akhil Reed Amar (Yale) and Vikram David Amar (Illinois) in Trump v. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
Vance, Trump v. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 12:53 am
The Petitioners were given until 16 May 2023 to file any reply that they wish to those objections. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 11:18 pm
But, if you want to know what Democrats think about this, and what they will do on January 6, 2025, take the time to read Yale Sterling Professor of Law Akhil Reed Amar's amicus brief, co-written with his brother Vikram, in Trump v. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 7:43 pm
Under the test of Chevron v. [read post]
15 Jan 2024, 12:20 am
But what is of relevance is the reliance that the Deputy Chancellor placed (at paragraph 9) upon observations from the judgment of Lord Reed, in the Supreme Court, in Walton v The Scottish Ministers [2012] UKSC 44, [2013] PTSR 51 (at paragraph 92) drawing a distinction between ‘the mere busybody and the person affected by or having a reasonable concern in the matter to which the application relates’. [read post]
