Search for: "Resnick v. Resnick" Results 21 - 40 of 251
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jul 2022, 4:57 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Moreover, “‘there is no private right of action against an attorney or law firm for violations of the Code of Professional Responsibility or disciplinary rules'” (Karimian v Karlin, 173 AD3d 614, 616, quoting Weinberg v Sultan, 142 AD3d 767, 769; see DeStaso v Condon Resnick, LLP, 90 AD3d 809, 814). [read post]
6 Jun 2022, 11:47 am by Resnick Law Group, P.C.
This is known as the “McDonnell Douglas framework,” after the Supreme Court’s 1973 ruling in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2021, 1:42 pm by Resnick Law Group, P.C.
Supreme Court first recognized sexual harassment as a form of sex discrimination under federal law in a 1986 decision, Meritor Savings Bank v. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 4:22 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“Causes of action alleging legal malpractice which would otherwise be time-barred are timely if the doctrine of continuous representation applies” (DeStaso v Condon Resnick, LLP, 90 AD3d 809, 812). [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 6:44 am by Resnick Law Group, P.C.
Supreme Court affirmed that a state law allowing city and county governments to enact vaccine mandates was constitutional in Jacobson v. [read post]
17 Mar 2021, 3:02 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” “As the Supreme Court noted, civil conspiracy is not recognized as a civil cause of action in New York (see Notaro v Performance Team, 136 AD3d 997, 999), nor does a violation of the Rules of Professional Responsibility, without more, support either an independent cause of action or a cause of action alleging legal malpractice, even where the alleged violation is a conflict of interest (see Doscher v Meyer, 177 AD3d 697, 699; DeStaso v Condon… [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 11:22 am by Resnick Law Group, P.C.
It has included sexual harassment since the Supreme Court’s 1986 decision in Meritor Savings Bank v. [read post]