Search for: "Response Brief for the United States Regarding the Court's Order for Petitioner to Show Cause"
Results 21 - 40
of 107
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Nov 2014, 3:09 am
SAWYERNo. 744 SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES343 U.S. 579; 72 S. [read post]
15 Aug 2020, 4:29 am
Daniels of the United States District Court (SDNY), and Joel R. [read post]
1 Jan 2025, 1:57 pm
The brief filed in No. 24-656 by Petitioners TikTok Inc. and ByteDance Ltd. [read post]
17 Jan 2025, 6:37 pm
Readers are requested to notify the Reporter ofDecisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Washington, D. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 1:20 pm
DEBRA COITO, Petitioner, v. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 12:52 pm
No error to deny Franks hearing where defendant failed to show false statements impacting the probable cause determination U.S. v. [read post]
7 May 2014, 6:45 am
United States 13-941Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, serves as counsel to the petitioner in this case, which is listed without regard to the likelihood that it will be granted.Issue: Whether an otherwise unconstitutional tax imposed upon the sale of goods in the stream of export commerce can be saved from invalidation under the Export Clause of the United States… [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 11:43 pm
See United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 6:32 pm
Some of the evidence that Petitioners cited in their opening brief was the same evidence that they cited in their reply to show that they had exhausted administrative remedies [after Appellants argued failure to prove exhaustion in their opposition briefs]. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 11:45 am
Compl. stated that Lisa was having some trouble in school but nothing to cause her to runaway. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 6:02 am
These activities caused VDO to sue petitioner for trademark infringement (the VDO suit). [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm
The United States Department of Agriculture’s California Raisin Marketing Order for raisins requires raisin growers in certain years to give percentage of their crop to the government, free of charge. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 6:36 am
A brief summary of the discussion of some landmark judgements delivered by the Supreme Court on the subject is given below. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 3:00 pm
United States, 490 U.S. 858, 873-74 (1989); see also Fed. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 10:39 am
http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/39254-2.10.doc.pdf Federal Law Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals: United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 1:29 pm
In United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 8:49 pm
A state district court held, after an extensive hearing, that although Trump had “engaged in insurrection” on January 6, 2021, nevertheless he wasn’t subject to Section 3’s disqualification because, inter alia, he had not taken an oath as an “officer of the United States” and, indeed, has never served as an “officer of the United States. [read post]
21 Apr 2025, 9:49 pm
Fourth, Judge Hendrix did not issue an order to show cause--unlike Judge Boasberg--but simply provided notice to the government: The Court therefore enters this Order notifying the government of the contents of this voicemail. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 9:27 am
Family Court granted petitioner’s application. [read post]
1 May 2012, 8:50 pm
Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Reply brief Adams v. [read post]
