Search for: "Reynolds v. Mitchell" Results 21 - 38 of 38
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Apr 2012, 5:51 am
For this proposition, reliance was placed on a first instance decision, Mitchell & Hobbs v Mill [1966] 2 BCLC 102, where Mr Machin QC had held that an individual director, as a general rule, lacks the power to commence proceedings in the name of the company. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
Briscoe-Mitchell v Hodder & Stoughton Ltd November 2008, Tugendhat J and Jury trial. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 4:33 pm by INFORRM
The case involves consideration of the operation of the “public interest” Reynolds defence and will be the third time this area has been considered by the highest court. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 1:22 pm by Andrew Hamm
Hinckley, 550 F.3d 926 (10th Cir. 2008) abrogated by Reynolds v. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 6:37 am by David Kravets
Photo: Leo Reynolds/Flickr Federal Communications Commission v. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 5:00 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Same problem occurs in trade dress cases—Reynolds v. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 12:43 pm
Glascock County Includes the cities of Edgehill, Gibson and Mitchell. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 2:00 pm by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
A Musical Experience + Helmut Lang + Henna by Senya + House of Leifer + J&J Snack Foods Corporation + J and V Audio Inc. + JAKKS Pacific, Inc. [read post]