Search for: "Rice v. Superior Court"
Results 21 - 40
of 90
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2015, 1:22 pm
Stennis to judgeships in the Los Angeles County Superior Court. [read post]
31 May 2018, 11:02 am
Superior Court (Hunter). [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 3:37 am
Cas. 755, 757 (No. 3,930) (Pa. 1789); Rice v. [read post]
31 Jan 2007, 9:33 pm
On January 19, Beenaturals removed the case from Wake County superior court. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 5:00 pm
See Rice v. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 4:36 am
PBM Products, LLC v. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 6:23 am
In Downing v. [read post]
12 Oct 2012, 4:48 pm
The state has or will appeal this decision to the Thurston Superior Court. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 11:47 am
Rice, 995 F.2d 719, 722 (7th Cir. 1993). [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 8:51 am
Scott V. [read post]
21 Apr 2024, 2:35 pm
Superior Ct. of Cal., San Francisco Cnty., 582 U.S. 255, 262 (2017)). [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 2:27 am
Rice, 1993 WL 375664, at *2 (4th Cir. [read post]
25 May 2018, 4:32 am
Atlantic Richfield Company, et al., Santa Clara County Superior Court, Case No. 1-00-CV-788657. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 5:05 am
Blue Buffalo Company Ltd. v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 3:23 am
Brekka, 581 F.3d 1127, 1130-31 (9th Cir. 2009) and Int’l Airport Centers LLC v. [read post]
28 Aug 2020, 9:02 am
The case: Rice v. [read post]
20 Jul 2016, 5:07 pm
Finally, the Interaction between Municipal and Superior Courts/Level and Degree of Offenses Subcommittee focused on a variety of issues regarding the handling and scheduling of domestic violence cases in both the Municipal and Superior courts, as well as current domestic violence laws and to make recommendations to improve those processes or laws. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 4:40 pm
On the same day, the court heard the defendant’s application to strike out the case of Vince v Associated Newspapers Limited KB-2023-003818. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 11:30 am
Superior Court [split-shift pay is wages]; and Huntington Memorial Hospital v. [read post]
23 Oct 2010, 11:40 pm
Judge Susan Illston found that there was "some evidence of dangerousness" in the BPH decision: There was sufficient evidence for the state superior court to uphold the BPH's decision. [read post]
