Search for: "Richard v. Commonwealth" Results 21 - 40 of 227
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Aug 2017, 6:00 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
By Richard Cooper, Luke Barefoot, Adam Brenneman and Antonio Pietrantoni1 If there is one thing that all stakeholders in Puerto Rico’s fiscal crisis can agree on (and there are likely not many such things), it is that, without real economic growth, the commonwealth of Puerto Rico will neither be able to repay its creditors nor offer its residents a viable, let alone prosperous, future. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 9:22 pm by Paul Horwitz
In the nineteenth century, many common or public schools, believing that religious and moral education was important but facing doctrinal disagreements within the broad Protestant majority, adopted a practice that John Jeffries and James Ryan call a "least-common-denominator Protestantism" that avoided areas of controversy. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 10:16 am by clayton
On June 24, 2009, Officers Christopher Morgan and Richard Diaz were in the Hyde Square neighborhood of the Jamaica Plain section of Boston. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 2:03 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) CPS v F [2011] EWCA Crim 1844 (21 July 2011) McDonald v R. [2011] EWCA Crim 1776 (21 July 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Rees & Anor v Peters [2011] EWCA Civ 836 (21 July 2011) Finnerty & Anor v Clark & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 858 (21 July 2011) Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council v Norton & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 834 (21 July 2011) Fulham Football Club (1987) Ltd v Richards… [read post]
5 May 2008, 2:36 pm
Loving last June, on the 40th anniversary of the Supreme Court's decision in Loving v. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
The first amendment combined with the supreme court’s 1964 landmark case of New York Times v Sullivan means that the bar is set very high for celebrities or public figures who want to sue for defamation. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 7:56 pm by cdw
LEXIS 2578 (9th Cir 2/8/2011) (double checking as it appears we may have already covered this decision a few editions back) Steven Richard Taylor v. [read post]