Search for: "Robarts v State" Results 21 - 40 of 119
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 May 2013, 5:31 am by Florian Mueller
In December she declined to rule on Apple's FRAND defenses in the first federal Apple v. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 6:04 pm by Florian Mueller
The United States District Court for the Western District of Washington held a Microsoft v. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 10:23 am by Florian Mueller
A month ago I reported on a Microsoft letter to the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, asking Judge James Robart for permission to bring a motion to "renew and expand" an anti-suit injunction so as to bar Google's Motorola Mobility from suing Microsoft in Mannheim, Germany, for royalties on patents declared essential to the H.264 video codec standard. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 8:01 am by Florian Mueller
In this post here I'd like to share with you the opening brief that Google's Motorola Mobility filed with the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit earlier this week in the Microsoft v. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 2:30 am by NCC Staff
Judge Robart, appointed by President George W. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 12:58 pm by Scott Bomboy
Washington state, supported by Minnesota and Hawaii, has made several arguments demanding Robart’s order remain in place. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 2:24 pm by Florian Mueller
A week before the Federal Circuit's appellate hearing on Judge Posner's Apple v. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 3:39 pm by Josh Blackman
” On its own terms, Judge Robart’s decision applied “on a nationwide basis . . . all United States borders and ports of entry. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 11:30 am by Florian Mueller
Today I've become aware of another ridiculously untrue assertion that is almost as bad as what happened in that Apple v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 3:59 pm
 Indeed, Judge Robart in Microsoft v Motorola had heard a full trial over a number of days and settled RAND terms of a portfolio licence of Motorola's US patents including arguments on the strength of the patents and F/RAND. [read post]