Search for: "Robbins v. Secretary of State"
Results 21 - 40
of 54
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2019, 8:14 am
Robbins, in which Justice Antonin Scalia wrote for a unanimous court that the secretary of labor’s interpretation of his own regulations is “controlling unless ‘plainly erroneous or inconsistent with the regulation. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 7:17 am
[Seminole Tribe v Florida, 116 S. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 8:54 am
Hudgens v. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 8:51 am
Secretary of the Army, 17-225 Issue: Whether Bowles v. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 7:31 am
Cuttic v. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 6:18 am
Auer v. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 12:15 pm
The new chief, Ran Baratz, has previously “suggested President Obama was anti-Semitic and compared Secretary of State John Kerry’s ‘mental age’ to that of a preteen. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 12:51 pm
Secretary of the Army 17-225 Issue: Whether Bowles v. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 11:19 am
Robbins and Bowles v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am
Case No.: 6:07-cv-839-Orl-35-KRS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et. al., Respondents. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 11:39 am
United States and Beckles v. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 5:30 pm
Peter O’ Rourke, Acting Secretary of Veteran Affairs.37 Kisor is not a tax case, but its implications for taxpayers could be significant. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 4:10 am
” United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 1:25 am
Co. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 9:05 pm
Robbins and Chevron v. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 11:16 am
Secretary of the Army, 17-225 Issue: Whether Bowles v. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 7:57 am
Secretary of the Army, 17-225 Issue: Whether Bowles v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 8:45 am
Secretary of State (twice). [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 5:08 am
The Court refused to read the request in the narrower fashion suggested by ACLJ, limiting it to communications by the Secretary’s “aides” and “staff,” namely, an identifiable group of DHS employees closest to the Secretary. [read post]
10 May 2012, 9:22 am
Robbins, 519 U.S. 452, 461-62 (1997) (deferring to an agency’s interpretation of its own regulation stated in an amicus brief). [read post]
