Search for: "Robert Blakely" Results 21 - 40 of 468
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2023, 5:13 am
Says tiny little Mickey:That's Robert Blake. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 6:30 am
Kothari (Massachusetts Institute of Technology), and Robert Pozen (Massachusetts Institute of Technology), on Thursday, February 16, 2023 Tags: Board of Directors, CEOs, Corporate governance, Executive Compensation, GAAP, S&P 500 [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 6:30 am
Kothari (Massachusetts Institute of Technology), and Robert Pozen (Massachusetts Institute of Technology), on Thursday, February 16, 2023 Tags: Board of Directors, CEOs, Corporate governance, Executive Compensation, GAAP, S&P 500 [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 8:17 am by SCOTUSblog
Here’s the Wednesday morning read: At the Supreme Court, Ethics Questions Over a Spouse’s Business Ties (Steve Eder, The New York Times) The Sotomayor and Kagan retirement question (Aaron Blake, The Washington Post) How the Supreme Court Protects Police Officers (Joanna Schwartz, The Atlantic) The Supreme Court takes up Section 230 (Tom Wheeler, Brookings) The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court Wasn’t Always Like John Roberts (Dahlia Lithwick, Slate) The post The… [read post]
29 Jan 2023, 7:33 pm by admin
Blakely, Raphael Bueno, Aleksandra Bzura, Giuseppe Cardillo, Jane E. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 9:06 pm by Bill Marler
District Judge Robert Pitman in Austin, Texas, was consistent with the terms of a plea agreement previously filed in the case. [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 4:33 pm by Bill Marler
District Judge Robert Pitman in Austin, Texas, was consistent with the terms of a plea agreement previously filed in the case. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 1:18 pm by bndmorris
Murphy’s article The DIY Unitary Executive was cited in the following article: Robert L. [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 4:50 am
In re Robert Green Hospitality, LLC, Serial No. 90065535 (November 10, 2022) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Thomas W. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 1:59 pm by William Appleton
    Blake Reid provided a detailed summary of the Republican National Convention’s (RNC) Oct. 21 lawsuit against Google for unlawful discrimination, alleging that Gmail flags RNC emails as spam leading to interference with fundraising efforts. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 7:19 am by Guest Author
Burwell that the MQD is serving as a kind of jurisdictional tool that’s meant to keep agencies from exceeding their zone of expertise, à la Chief Justice Roberts’s dissent in City of Arlington).The Pro-MQD Literature Historically, the MQD literature has been one-sided. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 2:57 am by INFORRM
On 1 November 2022, there was a trial of preliminary issues in the case of Blake v Fox. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 8:24 am by Jonathan Bailey
To back up his claim, he found an ally in conductor Robert Tomaro, who said that the similarities between the two were clear-cut. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 8:33 am by Jonathan Bailey
Let me know via Twitter @plagiarismtoday. 1: WWE, Video-Game Maker Owe Artist for Depicting Wrestler’s Tattoos, Jury Says First off today, Blake Brittain at Reuters reports that tattoo artist Catherine Alexander has emerged victorious in a recent trial against Take-Two Interactive over the use of tattoos she created in a video game. [read post]
29 Sep 2022, 9:18 am by Greg Reeves
  Similarly, Robert Blake, although acquitted in the criminal case, was found liable to the tune of $30 million in his civil trial. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 8:25 am by admin
McShane, David Gal, Andrew Gelman, Christian Robert, and Jennifer L. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 6:27 am by Jeff Kosseff, Matthew Schafer
Robert Welch, which requires private-figure defamation plaintiffs to establish fault; and Philadelphia Newspapers v. [read post]
3 Jul 2022, 7:15 am by Guest Author
Others, like Blake Emerson and Beau Baumann, view the major-questions doctrine as a tool that allows courts to overturn decisions that conflict with their ideological preferences.[2] Regardless of the substantive inquiry, I tend to agree with Daniel Walters and Kristin Hickman that the major-questions doctrine will only be applied in a handful of cases. [read post]