Search for: "Robert E Thompson" Results 21 - 40 of 309
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2023, 10:53 am by Anna Bower
  On Jan. 9, the grand jury’s supervising judge, Robert McBurney, issued an order dissolving the special purpose grand jury. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 5:20 am by Bernard Bell
Can an agency properly invoke the deliberative process privilege to shield internal deliberations over a sham memo requesting that another agency take action, knowing that the recipient agency will use the request to hide the real reason for its contemplated action? [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal Conservative Group Pressing States to Adopt Laws Protecting Companies from ‘Political Boycotts’: Report Yahoo News – Jared Gans (The Hill) | Published: 11/11/2022 A conservative group is planning to push state lawmakers across the country to adopt legislation to shield American companies from “political boycotts. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
Thompson (Georgetown University Law Center), and Harwell Wells (Temple University – James E. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
Thompson (Georgetown University Law Center), and Harwell Wells (Temple University - James E. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
IAPP Director of Research and Insight Mark Thompson, CIPP/E, CIPM, CIPT, FIP, Centre for Information Policy Leadership Senior Data Strategy and Privacy Policy Advisor Vivienne Artz, IAPP Europe Managing Director Isabelle Roccia, and IAPP Senior Westin Research Fellow Jetty Tielemans will discuss the proposed changes, similarities with existing regulatory structures, what it could mean for the U.K. data protection regime and more. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 9:05 pm by Stephen M. Bainbridge
., dissenting). [13] Stout, supra note 2, at 168. [14] Thompson v. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 9:05 am by Katherine Pompilio
Stevens, of counsel at Poarch Thompson Law on behalf of the Federal Bar Association; and Mimi E. [read post]
§ 2204(e)), implicate this court’s or the district court’s jurisdiction in this case? [read post]