Search for: "Robert M. Stephens" Results 21 - 40 of 1,793
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2024, 12:24 pm by Josh Blackman
[Professor Shugerman's argument that the 1793 Hamilton Document, that is, a list of "every person holding any civil office or employment under the United States, (except the judges)," was intended to ensure compliance with the Constitution's Sinecure Clause lacks support.] [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 5:50 am by Preston Lim
In June 2023, Canada’s Minister of Foreign Affairs, Mélanie Joly, announced that the Government of Canada had seized an Antonov-124 cargo aircraft under the Special Economic Measures Act (“SEMA”). [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Robert Zeidman, a computer forensics expert did just that, a federal judge determined, upholding a previous ruling from a private arbitration panel. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 9:35 am by fjhinojosa
Casto, The Effectiveness of Customary International Law: Stephen Lushington and the Trent Affair, 22 Wash. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 5:45 am by Mark Graber
  Justice Stephen Field’s charge in Greathouse v. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 4:53 am by Gerard N. Magliocca
Stephens, the Vice President of the Rebel Confederacy, eligible to the Presidency of the United States").14. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 7:23 am by Amy Howe
Chief Justice John Roberts said in a press release announcing O’Connor’s death that O’Connor “blazed a historic trail as our Nation’s first female Justice. [read post]
26 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Berle Professor of Law and Director of the Center on Corporate Governance, Columbia Law School) will moderate the discussion, and panelists will include: Stephen Fraidin, Partner, Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP Robert J. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 11:41 am by Kevin LaCroix
Stephen Davidson and Stephen Kyriacou set a convincing example for AJI in their article: “Adverse judgment insurance protects defendants in pending litigation, or parties that may become defendants in future litigation, against the risk of a potentially significant or catastrophic adverse judgment. [read post]