Search for: "Roberts v. Love" Results 21 - 40 of 1,771
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2024, 12:36 am by centerforartlaw
The European Court of Human Rights in the decision Bayev and others v. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
For many business economists and legal academics, the purpose of any business organization is simply stated: to maximize profits. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 4:41 am by Gerard N. Magliocca
The logic of Trump is something that only Chat-GPT could love. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 12:05 am by Josh Richman
I would love to hear your thinking about how facial recognition might play a role in our lives if we get it right. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 10:07 am by admin
Last week, Bayer broke its Philadelphia losing streak, with a win in Kline v. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 6:56 am by centerforartlaw
By Atreya Mathur ​​In a world where creativity knows no bounds and the lines between art, inspiration and infringement blur, one art collective stands at the forefront of pushing these boundaries. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
I wanted to demonstrate the fallacy of imagining the Taft Court as simply the Roberts Court in top hats. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Use expressio unis to get at the fact that the noncommercial use holding is limited to situations where the challenged use is “used as a mark for a commercial product”; the term noncommercial use can reasonably include uses as a mark for political speech—Robert Kennedy, Jr., is using his father’s famous name to promote himself politically (also highlighting the importance of small differences when it comes to speech in the political realm). [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 7:47 am by Hayleigh Bosher
This review is kindly provided by Thorsten Lauterbach, Teaching Excellence Fellow at the Robert Gordon University in Aberdeen, passionate about IP Law since he studied it as an undergraduate in the mid-1990s at Abertay Dundee. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
Bell as well as the anti-miscegenation statute at issue in Loving v. [read post]