Search for: "Roberts v. State Tax Commission"
Results 21 - 40
of 445
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2015, 6:40 am
Tax, of course, was the driving factor in one of two same sex marriage cases United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 5:55 am
The decline in the price of telecommunications service, combined with the shift in consumer purchases from telecommunications services to internet access, has forced the Federal Communication Commission (FCC) to increase rates just to keep revenues constant. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:53 am
Last week, in Citizens United v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 2:34 am
Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission, in which it will consider whether the Constitution prohibits the state’s voters from handing over authority for redistricting to independent commissions. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 4:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 4:00 am
Joe Dunman, Brief for Amicus Curiae The Kentucky Commission on Human Rights, Nelson v. [read post]
31 May 2019, 6:00 am
Simon LazarusIn my previous blog post, I explained why Chief Justice Roberts’ 2012 decision in NFIB v. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 2:55 pm
Lopez v. [read post]
12 May 2021, 4:45 am
The commission authorized the expenditure of state funds on December 19, 1988, and paid out the funds between July 1989 and December 1989. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 6:25 am
The Federal Election Campaign Act and Buckley v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 5:06 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 11:47 am
Webster County Commission) as ”the rare case” where a state’s guarantee of tax equality is so “clear and dramatic” that there is no rational way to explain it away. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 3:22 am
Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission, in which the Court will consider whether the Constitution prohibits the state’s voters from handing over authority for redistricting to independent commissions. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 3:25 pm
Federal Trade Commission, in which Roberts and Justice Kennedy recognized that an entity controlled by financially interested market participants was functionally a private actor, whereas Scalia, Thomas, and Alito were happy to deem them public actors as long as the state labeled them a state agency. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 3:31 am
At Dorf on Law, Michael Dorf maintains that “Justice Kennedy’s majority opinion inadequately responds to the key objection by Chief Justice Roberts” in dissent that a change in states’ ability to tax out-of-state retailers should come from Congress. [read post]
4 May 2018, 6:01 am
The Middle-Market IPO Tax Posted by Robert J. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 8:39 pm
Despite the judge's proffered psychological evidence of suffering from an anxious state of mind due to a strained marriage and recognizable prior service record, the public confidence which had been lost was irreparable" INJURY AND TORT LAW, SPORTS LAW Roberts v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 7:32 am
Anticipating what a victory for same-sex advocates could mean in United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 8:45 am
The major remaining federal tax benefits are the energy tax credit under IRC Section 48, the production tax credit under IRC Section 45, and accelerated tax depreciation under IRC Section 168. [read post]
3 Jan 2020, 9:05 pm
In a recent report from the Tax Policy Center, Richard Auxier analyzes state sports betting regulations after Murphy v. [read post]
