Search for: "Roberts v. Weiner" Results 21 - 40 of 58
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Dec 2017, 11:19 am by Wolfgang Demino
ONE MONTH INTO THE FIGHT OVER HEART AND SOUL NOT TO MENTION CONTROL OF THE CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAUDocket entry for 12/22 injunction hearing says "oral arguments heard. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 11:19 am by Wolfgang Demino
ONE MONTH INTO THE FIGHT OVER HEART AND SOUL NOT TO MENTION CONTROL OF THE CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU Docket entry for 12/22 injunction hearing says "oral arguments heard. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 10:20 am by Garrett Hinck
Kahn posted the government’s reply brief in ACLU v. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 4:43 am by Edith Roberts
” Additional commentary on the case comes from Dan Weiner and Brent Ferguson at U.S. [read post]
7 Mar 2015, 6:12 pm
" In related commentary, today at "Balkinization," Rob Weiner has a guest blog post titled "Clarity. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 10:06 am
 Robert Weiner, over on ScotusBlog, has a pretty interesting piece focusing on the capitalizations in the statutory text – in particular, the capital “E” in “Exchange. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 6:40 pm
 Other panelists includes Carrie Severino of the Judicial Crisis Network, Simon Lazarus of the Constitutional Accountability Center, and Robert Weiner of Arnold & Porter. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 6:19 am
” Other panelists include Carrie Severino of the Judicial Crisis Network, Robert Weiner of Arnold & Porter, and Simon Lazarus of the Constitutional Accountability Center. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 4:59 am by Amy Howe
There’s still more commentary on King v. [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 10:35 am by Guest Blogger
  Particularly worth reading is a brief filed by Robert Weiner for Families USA which develops with great clarity the legal argument for upholding the IRS rule. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 8:20 pm
" Robert Weiner has a post titled "King v. [read post]
16 Aug 2014, 12:15 pm by Guest Blogger
Rob Weiner In prior posts, I have described Halbig v. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 6:11 am by Jim Sedor
McCutcheon v. the Federal Election Commission seeks to eliminate the ceiling on what wealthy individuals can donate to federal candidates, parties, and PACs in a two-year election cycle. [read post]