Search for: "Roe et al v. Doe et al" Results 21 - 40 of 57
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2020, 4:40 pm
Check out the sanctions award of $25K+ here (pp. 21-25) in the unusually captioned matter of Roe 1 et al. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 4:05 am by SHG
The doctrine of stare decisis is white hot politically, as it raises the fears of a conservative partisan court overruling Roe v. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
And relying on the defense that, by current standards, Sanders et al. are literally as far left as US politics goes simply misses the import of words. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 4:52 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Marie Tribe of Chippewa (Bankruptcy; Tribal Sovereign Immunity) Oglala Sioux Tribe, et al. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
As some observers have suggested, for example, Roberts et al. might continue to issue rulings that amount to reversals of precedent without calling them reversals.The most widely discussed example of this would be for the Court not to overrule Roe explicitly (because that would energize even some otherwise conservative voters) but instead to decide that there simply are no abortion restrictions that constitute an “undue burden. [read post]
  But, the New Mexico court’s opinion does illustrate another tough legal issue associated with the increasing commercialization of the traditional family farm. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 7:17 am by Paul Smith
  But for Justice Scalia et al., this is not a problem. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 6:00 am by Administrator
The speaker may be looking for the next word, phrase, or idea, or making a decision about the next thought.25 Accordingly, the rate of uhs and ums increases when the topic is more abstract, as well as when the speaker is choosing from a larger vocabulary.26 As the range of options increases, so does the task complexity and [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 8:49 am by WIMS
Army Corps of Engineers, et al, without comment letting stand the 6th Circuit decision HMC v. [read post]