Search for: "Rogers v. McDonald" Results 21 - 40 of 71
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Oct 2019, 9:19 am
Revokey McRevokeface for McDonalds McMark Supermac's v McDonald's Cancellation no. 14787C, EUIPO (July 2019) I covered an earlier chapter of this burger battle in Volume V, in which poor evidence led to the loss of a BIG MAC EU trade mark registration. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 7:20 am by Joy Waltemath
Justice McDonald filed a vigorous dissent, alleging the majority had engaged in “linguistic origami” in reaching its conclusion (Cruz v Visual Perceptions, LLC, official release February 11, 2014, Rogers, C). [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 8:44 am by Kevin LaCroix
Six Flags Entertainment Corporation, 129 N.E.3d 1197 (2019). [16] See McDonald v. [read post]
6 May 2022, 5:50 pm by Gregory Forman
Melissa Butler and Judge Stephanie McDonald who took the time and effort to share their passion for appellate work. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 12:16 pm by Eugene Volokh
” This is what the Second Circuit correctly held as to the film title “Fred & Ginger,” which deliberately referred to Fred Astaire and Ginger Rogers, Rogers v. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal A Conspiracy of Hunches: Roger Stone trial set to start this week San Francisco Chronicle – Devlin Barrett, Spencer Hsu, and Manuel Roig-Franzia (Washington Post) | Published: 11/4/2019 Roger Stone is on trial in federal court, where prosecutors plan to dive back into an episode of political chicanery, alleged lies, and conspiratorial texts that parallels the nascent impeachment inquiry into his longtime friend President Trump. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 9:32 am
McDonald's Issue: Whether, under the Lanham Act, Burger King met prudential standing requirements to bring a false advertising claim against McDonald's for fraud involved in various promotional games. [read post]
30 Oct 2021, 12:18 pm by Stephen P. Halbrook
” This was the kind of law that the 14th Amendment was adopted to preclude, as McDonald v. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 3:39 am
Lopez, which struck down the Gun Free School Zones Act, and the second was US v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 5:58 pm by Josh Blackman
This mirrors his rejection of the Slaughter-House Cases in McDonald v. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 2:50 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Silbey: Interaction b/t TM and other fields matters here—bankruptcy.Lemley: Lynn LoPucki suggested that we could take franchising more seriously—if you hold yourself out as a McDonald’s, you’re a McDonald’s and your employees are McDonald’s employees.McKenna: confusion isn’t found in nature; you have to know where to look to do a survey and once you ask a set of people you’ve defined a market. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 9:18 am by INFORRM
  He appeared in many of the leading defamation cases over a period of over 40 years, including the case of Irving v Penguin Books [2000] EWHC QB 155 and McDonalds v Steel [1997] EWHC QB 366. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 3:49 am by Russ Bensing
Heller and McDonald v. [read post]