Search for: "Rogers v. United States et al"
Results 21 - 40
of 224
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Nov 2022, 7:56 am
McLeer et al v. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 4:00 am
” (The Hearing Clinic (Niagara Falls) Inc. v. 866073 Ontario Limited, et al., 2014 ONSC 5831) “…but much of the rest of the 89 pages of testimony resembles a comedy routine that might have been inspired by Monty Python’s Flying Circus. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 11:35 am
Just as I paid no attention to a variety of other cases that were launched in hopes of eventually getting a cert. grant, such as Rogers v. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 12:27 am
Then the focus is on whether Apple abuse its aftermarket monopoly.I've previously explained in detail why Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California got the law, the economics, and the technology wrong with respect to the foremarket part. [read post]
18 Sep 2022, 6:00 pm
HISTORIC CLASS-ACTION DECISION RELEASEDOn September 15, 2022, City Limits reported on a recent New York County Supreme Court decision which may ultimately benefit some 2000 Harlem tenants.The case - - Maddicks et al. v 106-108 Convent BCR, LLC - - involves eleven (11) buildings that are part of the Big City Realty/Magnolia Holdings portfolio. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 1:34 pm
Source: Complaint at 4, Vans, Inc. et al v. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 1:34 pm
Source: Complaint at 4, Vans, Inc. et al v. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 4:48 am
Googlepotentially United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 12:07 am
"At first sight, Société du Figaro et al. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2022, 6:53 am
First. in Entergy Arkansas, LLC, et al. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 7:13 am
For example, he raises and explains the problem encountered for causal inference by small relative risks: “Small relative risks of the order of 2:1 or even less are what are likely to be observed, like the risk now recorded for childhood leukemia and exposure to magnetic fields of 0.4 µT or more (Ahlbom et al. 2000) that are seldom encountered in the United Kingdom. [read post]
11 Jun 2022, 9:11 am
Amalfi et al., and how the ruling may impact former President Trump should he run for president again. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 11:56 am
Amalfi et al., and how the ruling may impact former President Trump. [read post]
25 May 2022, 8:40 am
United States, 320 U.S. 81 (1943) and Yasui v. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 5:53 pm
Tanner v. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 2:55 am
Pappas et al. find that counterfeit cigarettes can have as much as seven times the lead of authentic brands, and close to three times as much thallium, a toxic heavy metal.[14] Other sources report finding insect eggs, dead flies, mold, and human feces in counterfeit cigarettes.[15] During prohibition of alcohol in the United States during the 1920s, increased enforcement did not manage to significantly decrease the prevalence of bootlegging because the… [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 2:00 am
Ashad Umrani, et al. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
(HERE).The Conference brought together some of the most important and influential thinkers about the fundamentals of law in general, and that of the United States in particular. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 10:58 am
In the United States (US), as for most developed countries,[6] trade policy and IP standards have consistently been linked, a pattern which can (at least partially) be traced back to extensive lobbying by senior management at US-based technology and pharmaceutical firms.[7] For example, since at least the 1980s, Pfizer Inc. has been involved in mobilizing other US firms and stakeholders to lobby US policymakers on the issue of international IP protection. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 2:46 pm
This group—along with well-known lawyers, Paul Marshall and Stephen Mason, an academic criminal lawyer, Jonathan Rogers, a software testing and auditing expert, James Christie, and a statistician, Martin Newby—adapted for the public advice that had been requested by the UK Ministry of Justice; this included, "In principle, the threshold for rebutting the presumption so that the onus of proof is upon the party relying upon a document to prove it, and thus prove the integrity… [read post]
