Search for: "Roman Catholic Archbishop of Washington"
Results 21 - 40
of 50
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Oct 2015, 8:00 pm
Roman Catholic Archbishop of Washington v. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 1:15 pm
As I explained here and here, I think it is likely that the Court will, at a minimum, accept the government's suggestion and grant the petition in No. 14-1505, Roman Catholic Archbishop of Washington v. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 7:08 am
John Elwood reviews Tuesday’s relisted cases. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 12:15 pm
John Elwood reviews this week’s relisted cases. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 4:15 pm
As expected, the government argues that the most suitable vehicle for the Court's review is Case No. 14-1505, Roman Catholic Archbishop of Washington v. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 3:23 am
" He does, however, signal (pp.30-31) that if and when the Court decides to consider the question, it should grant the petition in No. 14-1505, Roman Catholic Archbishop of Washington v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:07 am
The Roman Catholic Archbishop of Washington is also one of the plaintiffs: Even though it is entirely exempt from the regulation (that is, its employees are not entitled to contraception coverage), it alleges that its religious exercise is burdened because it is the sponsor of a church plan used by some of the other plaintiffs. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:34 am
In an Associated Press story, the Tulsa World reports that the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit has rejected a challenge by religious groups, including Priests For Life and the Roman Catholic Archbishop of Washington,... [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 7:06 am
Priests for Life and the Roman Catholic Archbishop of Washington [advocacy websites] challenged new rules [text, PDF] proposed by the Department of Health and Human... [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 9:03 am
Circuit, the Roman Catholic Archbishop of Washington, D.C., and several of its affiliated organizations — including Catholic University — contended that the supposed accommodation does not go far enough to protect their religious freedom, because the filing of any notice “triggers” the availability of the very service to which they object as a matter of religious faith. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 11:50 pm
HHS, No. 13-5368, and Roman Catholic Archbishop of Washington v. [read post]
9 May 2014, 4:10 am
Department of Health and Human Services and in Roman Catholic Archbishop of Washington v. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 1:08 pm
Both cases, Roman Catholic Archbishop of Washington v. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 8:02 am
The first of today's denials was in Roman Catholic Archbishop of Washington v. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 11:23 am
The petition in Roman Catholic Archbishop of Washington v. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 6:00 am
Circuit, by a 2-1 vote, granted emergency motions for injunctions pending appeal filed by by Priests for Life (see prior posting) and by the various plaintiffs (other than Thomas Aquinas College that prevailed below) in the Roman Catholic Archbishop of Washington case. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 3:30 am
The government isn’t violating Notre Dame’s right to free exercise of religion by letting it opt out, or by arranging for third party contraception coverage.Rick Garnett comments briefly on the decision at Mirror of Justice.Meanwhile, the D.C. federal district court handed down a much longer (94 pages), more complicated and nuanced decision in Roman Catholic Archbishop of Washington v. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 6:21 am
Massachusetts – Cardinal O’Malley Invites Lawmakers to a Get-Together Boston Globe – Jim O’Sullivan and Lisa Wagsness | Published: 10/9/2013 Cardinal Sean O’Malley, the Roman Catholic archbishop of Boston, will meet with the Massachusetts lawmakers who represent cities and towns within the archdiocese in what one of his aides described as “relationship building. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 12:51 pm
The motion and supporting memorandum (full text) in Roman Catholic Archbishop of Washington v. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm
Although this was the very best they could have hoped for, the Catholic bishops objected to even these new regulations. [read post]
