Search for: "Root v. State"
Results 21 - 40
of 4,575
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2024, 2:16 pm
In Eisenhauer v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 4:25 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 8:40 am
By contrast, Paul-Emile’s theory might suggest a revisionist reading of Gonzales v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 7:33 am
Supreme Court in Oklahoma v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 9:00 am
Muldrow v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 8:36 am
In In Re Jackson, Judge Leval applied this approach to a right of publicity claim, but it is applicable to any state law cause of action, and in X v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 8:00 am
That was the argument before the Florida Supreme Court in the case of Malicki v. [read post]
16 May 2024, 7:00 pm
United States and Idaho v. [read post]
16 May 2024, 1:24 pm
The United States Department of Labor (DOL) is charged with enforcing the requirements of ERISA. [read post]
12 May 2024, 9:05 pm
Raimondo and Relentless, Inc. v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:30 pm
Ralph Richard Banks, Standford Law, asks, Brown v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
9 May 2024, 2:41 pm
S. 555 (1983), and United States v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 6:05 am
” At its core, Weinstein’s case simply applied the long-established rules of the more than century-old case of People v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
7 May 2024, 9:31 am
This is recognized in the State Department’s Foreign Affairs Manual (FAM) at 9 FAM § 402.1-3 , which states that an “applicant desiring to come to the United States for one principal purpose, and one or more incidental purposes, must be classified in accordance with the principal purpose. [read post]
6 May 2024, 10:42 am
"] From A.M.B. v. [read post]
5 May 2024, 9:44 am
In sum, a defendant like Freed must have actual authority rooted in written law or longstanding custom to speak for the State. [read post]
