Search for: "Rosado v Rosado"
Results 21 - 40
of 145
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2008, 8:12 pm
Rosado-Quinones v. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 4:52 am
Descarga el documento: Rosario Rosado v. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 11:43 am
In Hines v. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 3:50 am
”# # #SOURCEDECISION & ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS (January 9, 2023) (Rosado, J.)Housing Rights Initiative v. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 3:50 am
”# # #SOURCEDECISION & ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS (January 9, 2023) (Rosado, J.)Housing Rights Initiative v. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 4:36 am
Rosado is a pro-se legal malpractice case which comes after plaintiff has settled a case, and then wriggled to get out of the settlement. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 2:46 pm
In Hines v. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 5:04 am
Rosado is an example of what courts fear in the legal malpractice field: metastasizing suits, each based upon the earlier suit. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 2:12 pm
US v. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 4:40 am
Duckles v Zatkowsky 2023 NY Slip Op 31942(U) June 9, 2023 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 156173/2022 Judge: Mary V. [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 4:12 am
Sometimes, as in Encalada v McCarthy, Chachanover & Rosado, LLP 2018 NY Slip Op 02434 Decided on April 10, 2018 Appellate Division, First Department it is the opposite. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 5:00 am
Rosado are dismissed. [read post]
30 Dec 2008, 7:53 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 5:36 am
Rosado is an interesting variant on the more usual case where Plaintiff is being sued for fees and brings a legal malpractice case against the attorney. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 12:12 pm
In Hines v. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 6:02 am
AC34533 - State v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 6:00 am
However, his reasons for walking on the floor despite the warnings are irrelevant since a slip and fall would not be unexpected in the circumstances.A remand to the Trustees is not warranted since they considered the statements of the three witnesses, which were consistent, and petitioner did not deny that their account of the incident was accurate (see Matter of McCartan v Shea, 211 AD3d 534, 535 [1st Dept 2022]).THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE… [read post]
7 May 2024, 6:00 am
However, his reasons for walking on the floor despite the warnings are irrelevant since a slip and fall would not be unexpected in the circumstances.A remand to the Trustees is not warranted since they considered the statements of the three witnesses, which were consistent, and petitioner did not deny that their account of the incident was accurate (see Matter of McCartan v Shea, 211 AD3d 534, 535 [1st Dept 2022]).THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE… [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 1:02 pm
Descarga el documento: Fernández-Salicrup v. [read post]
14 Mar 2018, 7:45 am
La vista preliminar del caso contra el ex-alcalde de Guaynabo, Héctor O’Neill, que estaba pautada para el pasado 27 de febrero de 2018, fue re programada para el próximo 20 de marzo, luego de que la juez Sariely Rosado Fernández ordenara la celebración de una vista de necesidad para el 19 de marzo. [read post]
