Search for: "Rosenfeld v. Rosenfeld"
Results 21 - 40
of 117
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Aug 2010, 4:11 pm
See Johnson v. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 4:00 am
Bucaria in Rosenfeld v. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 2:10 am
And those were the facts in Rosenfeld v. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 5:47 am
After the dismissal, Rosenfeld appealed and this week in Rosenfeld v. [read post]
18 Dec 2024, 4:22 am
The case is USA v. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 1:23 pm
Rosenfeld. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 7:30 am
Michel Rosenfeld, Cardozo Law, will comment. [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 3:08 am
Rosenfeld, 295 AD2d 261, 261 [1st Dept 2002]). [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 4:00 am
., Brief of Amici Curiae Scholars of The Constitutional Rights and Interests Of Children in Support of Respondents in Masterpiece Cakeshop LTD, et al v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 5:30 pm
Also, on LXBN, Zosha writes on Hillary Clinton and Jerry Maatman joins me to talk EEOC v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 3:16 am
The second cause of action, alleging legal malpractice, is barred under the doctrine of res [*2]judicata by the court's imprimatur of a retaining lien (see Kinberg v Garr, 28 AD3d 245 [2006]; Molinaro v Bedke, 281 AD2d 242 [2001]; Summit Solomon & Feldesman v Matalon, 216 AD2d 91 [1995], lv denied 86 NY2d 711 [1995]; see generally Blair v Bartlett, 75 NY 150, 154 [1878]). [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 3:07 am
The second cause of action, alleging legal malpractice, is barred under the doctrine of res [*2]judicata by the court's imprimatur of a retaining lien (see Kinberg v Garr, 28 AD3d 245 [2006]; Molinaro v Bedke, 281 AD2d 242 [2001]; Summit Solomon & Feldesman v Matalon, 216 AD2d 91 [1995], lv denied 86 NY2d 711 [1995]; see generally Blair v Bartlett, 75 NY 150, 154 [1878]). [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 2:02 am
See Zletz v. [read post]
26 Mar 2011, 3:42 pm
Moreover, since the scaffold lacked safety railings, the defendant's alleged intoxication was not the sole proximate cause of his injuries (see Bondanella v Rosenfeld, 298 AD2d 941, 942, 747 N.Y.S.2d 645; Podbielski v KMO-361 Realty Assocs.., 294 A.D.2d 552, 553-554, 742 N.Y.S.2d 664; Sergeant v Murphy Family Trust, 284 AD2d 991, 992, 726 N.Y.S.2d 537). [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 9:12 am
See State v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 4:39 pm
Paying for Dropped Calls Every Month: Thank the Supreme Court and its 2010 Term - Washington, DC lawyer Steven Berk on his blog, The Corporate Observer UPDATE: Apple v. [read post]
8 Jun 2008, 1:13 am
EC Commission v. [read post]
22 May 2008, 8:52 am
[LINK] Tafas v. [read post]
30 Jan 2025, 1:47 pm
Judge Ruiz just issued his formal order in United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2022, 8:45 pm
v=o0OIfdlwZHwVideo Credit: Sean Evans, @evvo1991https://www.backtothemovies.com/ [read post]
