Search for: "Rounds v. Clements"
Results 21 - 40
of 106
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2012, 6:35 am
At the Daily Beast, Chris Geidner discusses Paul Clement’s position on federalism in some of his current cases. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 3:20 am
In a webcast at the Knowledge Center, Lisa Soronen and Paul Clement discuss the workings of the Supreme Court and the lower court. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 6:58 am
” As Joshua reported in Friday’s round-up, the Senate Judiciary Committee has passed on to the full chamber a bill that would allow Court proceedings to be televised. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 1:03 am
Bush (06-1195) and Al Odah v. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 6:39 am
United States and Black v. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 7:15 am
Paul Clement recently delivered the Hallows Lecture at Marquette Law School, discussing the healthcare case from last term. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 6:10 am
Briefly: At the New York Times, Kate Murphy interviews Paul Clement about his favorite movies, blogs, and brand of cycling shorts. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 10:08 pm
Supreme Court to rounds of a boxing bout, might as well extend the sports metaphor long enough to score yesterday's 3d round, recorded in this transcript and this audio. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 8:27 am
In November, the Court heard oral argument in Smith v. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 7:46 am
Coverage of health-care reform continues, as Adam mentioned in yesterday’s round-up. [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 7:30 am
” For The Atlantic, Garrett Epps relates the Court’s 1935 decision in Minersville School District v. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 6:24 am
But before offering previews of today’s cases, this round-up will summarize the post-argument recaps of yesterday’s cases. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 6:24 am
” At the Opinionator Blog of the New York Times, Linda Greenhouse discusses Simmons v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 6:51 am
Coverage of Tuesday’s order list, which Conor noted in yesterday’s round-up, continued. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 2:20 pm
Scott Nelson has this post at the Consumer Law & Policy Blog about the Court's unanimous decision in Watson v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 7:48 am
In another post for the National Law Journal, Mauro reports on a request made by former Solicitor General Paul Clement – who represents a group of former Justice Department prosecutors and civil rights officials – to argue on behalf of a criminal defendant in Connick v. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 7:32 am
The WSJ Law Blog commented on the "rematch of Paul Clement and Neal Katyal," who last argued against one another in 2006 in Hamdan v. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 5:56 am
At the Notice and Comment blog, David Feder discusses Esquivel-Quintana v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 6:27 am
Joan Biskupic of Reuters profiles Donald Verrilli and Paul Clement, the current and former Solicitors General, who argued against each other in two of the Term’s highest-profile cases. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 7:42 pm
” As part of the same discussion, Paul Clement debates whether the Court’s decision in Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
