Search for: "Royal v. Secretary of Health & Human Services" Results 21 - 32 of 32
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2024, 11:38 am by INFORRM
On 21 May 2024, judgment was handed down in R (On the application of National Council for Civil Liberties) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2024] EWHC 1181 (Admin). [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 1:11 am by INFORRM
The ICO have also fined three companies offering financial services a total of £170,000 for illegal direct marketing. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am by chief
For more detail you could do little better than head over to A royale quarterpounder, our post on Kay v UK, and you may also want to consider Nic Madge's take, not least as I've borrowed the inspiration for this subheading from him. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am by chief
For more detail you could do little better than head over to A royale quarterpounder, our post on Kay v UK, and you may also want to consider Nic Madge's take, not least as I've borrowed the inspiration for this subheading from him. [read post]
7 Jan 2023, 7:37 am by Eric Goldman
For example, during the COVID-19 pandemic, organisations such as the World Health Organization and the National Health Service were able to act as authoritative voices online. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 4:23 pm by Graham Smith
If the lengthy incubation has produced a swan, it is one whose feathers are already looking distinctly ruffled following the CJEU judgment in Watson/Tele2, issued three weeks after Royal Assent. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 4:23 pm by Graham Smith
Nevertheless judicial approval is a significant improvement on current practice whereby the Secretary of State alone takes the decision to issue a warrant. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 2:18 am by INFORRM
The bill would introduce new powers to deal with serious disruption caused by protesters, including allowing the Secretary of State to bring civil proceedings against campaigners. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 7:56 am by INFORRM
Neil Turner v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 12/04/2013; Ms Carina Trimingham v Daily Mirror, Clause 1, 11/04/2013; Ms Carina Trimingham v Metro, Clause 1, 11/04/2013; Bath & North East Somerset Council v The Times, Clause 5, 11/04/2013; Warren Hamilton Daily Mai, Clause 1, 11/04/2013; Catherine Whiteside The Scottish Sun, Clauses 1, 5, 11/04/2013; Ms Lynne Hales v Daily Mail, Clause 6, 11/04/2013; Emilie Sandy v The Citizen (Gloucester) v… [read post]
18 Nov 2024, 1:29 am by INFORRM
  The Judge ruled that there was “sufficient justification” for a limited number of emails sent between NGN employees and employees of the Royal Household to be disclosed, despite objections by the defendant that they were not relevant to the pleaded issues. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 3:20 am by INFORRM
Dan Wootton, former showbiz editor at the News of the World, told Lord Justice Leveson he believes all celebrities have a right to privacy, especially in areas of sexuality, health, pregnancy and family. [read post]