Search for: "Rubenstein v. Doe No. 1"
Results 21 - 34
of 34
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2011, 8:40 am
1-4. [44] In Maslen v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 2:46 pm
Well, after thinking it through a bit more, and talking to colleagues, I have come to the conclusion that 1) up until a few years ago, the facial regulatory takings claim made sense; but 2) in light of recent Supreme Court precedent, it no longer does. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 3:48 am
”The Appellate Division said that in an application for a stay of arbitration of a public sector labor dispute, two tests are applied: (1) does a statute, court decision or public policy bar arbitration of the matter in accordance with the Taylor Law? [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 10:38 am
Legis. 18-90 (2010).Rubenstein, David S. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 3:45 am
""However, a law firm's "failure to comply with the rules on retainer agreements (22 NYCRR 1215.1) does not preclude it from suing to recover legal fees for the services it provided" (Miller v Nadler, 60 AD3d 499, 500 [Sup Ct New York County 2009], citing Egnotovich v Katten Muchin Zavis & Roseman LLP, 55 AD3d 462, 464 [1st Dept 2008]; Nicoll & Davis LLP v Ainetchi, 52 AD3d 412 [1st Dept 2008]; Seth Rubenstein, P.C.… [read post]
10 May 2010, 4:01 am
Seth Rubenstein, PC v. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 3:22 am
Rubenstein v. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 4:38 am
See Rubenstein v. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 10:05 pm
C.A.), Elloway v. [read post]
29 Sep 2007, 6:07 am
Even if Iraq revokes the order, it can't do so retroactively.Order 17 does allow contractors' home states to waive their immunity. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 7:12 am
Lawrence Rosenthal, Does Due Process Have an Original Meaning? [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 9:41 am
Lawrence Rosenthal, Does Due Process Have an Original Meaning? [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 2:30 pm
Rubenstein v. [read post]
4 Apr 2007, 5:40 am
Benway v. [read post]
