Search for: "Ruck v. Ruck"
Results 21 - 40
of 116
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2012, 5:09 pm
Isabel Hudson is a partner at Carter-Ruck [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 2:02 am
Helena Shipman is an Associate a Carter-Ruck [read post]
11 Oct 2015, 10:44 am
The claimant is represented by Desmond Browne QC and Victoria Jolliffe, instructed by Carter-Ruck. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 4:09 pm
The case of Serafin v. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 8:41 am
The Explanatory Notes refer to Thornton (cited above) and Jameel v The Wall Street Journal Europe Sprl [2003] EWCA Civ 1694. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 4:42 pm
Persephone Bridgman Baker is a partner and Catriona Grew a paralegal at Carter Ruck [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 2:16 am
Andrew Stephenson is the Senior Partner of Carter-Ruck. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 4:42 pm
The case of Richard Burgon MP v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 1:30 am
Although the “folk belief” is that trial by jury is less favourable to the defendant, a number of the recent applications for trials by judge alone (Gregson, Charman v Orion 17 June 2005; Prince Radu of Hohenzollern v Houston [2007] EWHC 2328 (QB), Gentoo v Hanratty ([2008] EWHC 2328 (QB)) have been made by claimants. [read post]
16 Jan 2023, 4:10 pm
Persephone Bridgman Baker is a partner and Katherine Silverleaf a trainee at Carter-Ruck [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 4:08 pm
Mathilde Groppo is a Senior Associate at Carter-Ruck [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 10:30 am
He set out the stages laid down by Eady J in Turner v News Group Newspapers Ltd. [read post]
23 May 2021, 10:09 am
Ms Van Roy was represented by Nigel Tait, Helena Shipman and Katherine Hooley of Carter-Ruck, and Hugh Tomlinson QC and Aidan Wills of Matrix Chambers. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 11:35 pm
Carter-Ruck defends Hardeep Singh on CFA. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 12:08 am
In determining the appeal ([2018] EWCA Civ 170), Lady Justice Sharp approved Mitting J’s approach to establishing the meaning: “The Judge directed himself explicitly by reference to the well-established principles set out in Jeynes v News Magazines Limited [2008] EWCA Civ 130 (as qualified in Rufus v Elliott [2015] EWCA Civ 121); moreover, since he had merely used the dictionary definitions as a check and no more, his ultimate reasoning was sound. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 12:38 pm
Mr William McCormick (Carter Ruck) for the claimant submitted the judgment of Millet LJ in Berkoff v Burchill that “The question, however, is how the words would be understood, not how they were meant, and that is pre-eminently for the jury”. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 12:38 pm
These claims may have arose from the fact that this was a ‘spoof diary’ and inevitable use of material exaggerated for comical expression along side the use of actual fact on the part of Marian Hyde when writing the the diary.Mr William McCormick (Carter Ruck) for the claimant submitted the judgement of Millet LJ in Berkoff v Burchill that “The question, however, is how the words would be understood, not how they were meant, and that is pre-eminently for the… [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 4:42 pm
The Supreme Court yesterday handed down its long awaited judgment in Lachaux v Independent Print Ltd & Anor [2019] UKSC 27. [read post]
25 Jun 2016, 4:11 pm
Cairns v Modi; KC v MGN Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 1382). [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 4:07 pm
Although Hardeep Singh was ultimately represented by Carter-Ruck on a defendant’s CFA, the action was obviously a source of great stress and anxiety for him as he explained in an interview on the “Index on Censorship” website. [read post]
