Search for: "Rural Telephone Service Co. v. Feist Publications" Results 21 - 40 of 50
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Nov 2017, 12:56 am by Marie-Andree Weiss
Rural Telephone Service Co., Inc. , “[t]he sine qua non of copyright is originality. [read post]
Rural Telephone Service Co, Inc. provides that a work only requires a “modicum of creativity” to be considered “original. [read post]
Ugh
2 Oct 2008, 2:04 am
Rural Telephone Service, Co., "the originality requirement is not particularly stringent. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 4:29 am
The originality standard is a minimal degree of creativity as stipulated in Feist Publications v Rural Telephone Service Co., 499 U.S. 340 (1991). [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 2:41 pm by Ted Max
Rural Telephone Service, Co., 499 U.S. 341, 358-359 (1991)), and that this determination is remanded for the district court to decide.[6] The Court noted as a threshold question that separability analysis is needed to determine whether “surface decorations are protected two-dimensional works of graphic art. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 2:41 pm by Ted Max
Rural Telephone Service, Co., 499 U.S. 341, 358-359 (1991)), and that this determination is remanded for the district court to decide.[6] The Court noted as a threshold question that separability analysis is needed to determine whether “surface decorations are protected two-dimensional works of graphic art. [read post]
7 May 2012, 10:18 am by Matthew Hickey
Rural Telephone Service Co. which rejected the possibility of granting copyright on the basis of effort alone. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 4:00 am by Holly
Rural Telephone Service Company, Inc., 499 U.S. 340 (1991). [4] See Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 4:41 am by Terry Hart
Rural Telephone Service Co., 499 US 340, 345 (1991).H.R.Rep. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 3:40 am by Maxwell Kennerly
Rural Telephone Service Co., 499 U.S. 340 (1991)(“[N]o author may copyright facts or ideas. [read post]