Search for: "Russell v. Social Security Administration"
Results 21 - 40
of 98
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Dec 2020, 10:30 am
Saul (Mar. 3) (consolidated for one hour of oral argument): Whether someone who did not challenge the legitimacy of an administrative law judge’s appointment at the Social Security Administration can raise it for the first time in federal court. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:42 am
Russell and others v Transocean International Resources Limited (Scotland), heard 26 – 28 October 2011. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 3:40 am
Berryhill, in which the court held that an administrative judge in a social security disability benefits case can rely on testimony by a vocational expert that an applicant can do “other work,” even if the expert does not provide the data she used to form her opinion. [read post]
2 Apr 2022, 12:44 pm
Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 8:35 am
State of Oklahoma (Gaming – Arbitration Award) News Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/news/currentnews.html In the Culture & Tradition section, we feature an article about the Transportation Security Administration’s commitment to improve respectful handling of Native American sacred objects. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 12:49 am
Internet and Social Media Meta has asked for an exemption to be made from the provisions of the Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill for social media companies. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 8:42 am
In Kansas v. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 4:16 am
Whitford and Benisek v. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 11:32 am
Jeremy Gordon summarized the oral argument in the Supreme Court’s Hungary v. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 3:59 am
Berryhill, the court held 6-3 that an administrative judge in a social security disability benefits case can rely on testimony by a vocational expert that an applicant can do “other work,” even if the expert does not provide the data she used to form her opinion. [read post]
29 May 2019, 7:15 am
Berryhill, the court unanimously held that a Social Security Administration Appeals Council dismissal on timeliness grounds of a request for review after a claimant has had an administrative law judge hearing on the merits qualifies as a “final decision . . . made after a hearing” for purposes of allowing judicial review under 42 U.S.C. [read post]
28 May 2019, 2:08 pm
Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit and holds that an appeals council’s dismissal of a Social Security claim on timeliness grounds when the claimant has had an administrative law hearing qualifies as a final decision “made after a hearing” so as to allow judicial review under the Social Security Act. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 3:47 am
” Yesterday the Supreme Court ruled in Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 10:31 pm
Branch Western District of Kentucky at Louisville 08a0288p.06 2008/08/12 Russell v. [read post]
29 May 2018, 4:13 am
Securities and Exchange Commission, which asks whether SEC administrative law judges are “officers of the United States” within the meaning of the appointments clause, and Lagos v. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 11:56 am
Berryhill (Nov. 7) – Whether, when the Social Security Act provides that a court can award attorney’s fees “not in excess of 25 percent of the total of the past-due benefits to which the claimant is entitled,” the 25-percent cap applies only to attorney’s fees for representing a claimant in court or also to fees for representing a claimant before the Social Security Administration. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 10:51 am
Kenneth also flagged the Supreme Court’s grant of certiorari in Jesner v. [read post]
8 May 2015, 2:45 pm
Supreme Court Furman v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 2:13 pm
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW.Driesen, David M. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 6:23 am
” Finally, Robert Barnes of the Washington Post notes “unmistakable comparisons to the court’s action on the Social Security Act of 1935” (which the Court upheld in a pair of cases in 1937). [read post]
