Search for: "Russell v. Social Security Administration" Results 21 - 40 of 98
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2020, 4:48 am by Sophia Tang
The discretion shield aims to “prevent judicial ‘second-guessing’ of legislative and administrative decisions grounded in social, economic, and political policy through the medium of an action in tort. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 9:48 pm by Sophia Tang
The discretion shield aims to “prevent judicial ‘second-guessing’ of legislative and administrative decisions grounded in social, economic, and political policy through the medium of an action in tort. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 12:00 pm by Ronald Collins
He has received fellowships from the Cullman Center for Scholars and Writers at the New York Public Library, the Russell Sage Foundation and the American Council of Learned Societies. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 1:35 pm by Gordon Ahl, William Ford
The hearing will feature testimony from David Glawe, the undersecretary of homeland security for intelligence and analysis; Christopher Wray, the director of the FBI; and Russell Travers, the director of the National Counterterrorism Center. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 1:07 pm by Gordon Ahl, William Ford
" The committee will hear testimony from FBI Director Christopher Wray, and has subpoenaed Kevin McAleenan, the acting secretary of Homeland Security, and Russell Travers, the acting director of the National Counterterrorism Center, in an effort to compel their testimony. [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 3:56 am by Edith Roberts
Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. [read post]
29 May 2019, 7:15 am by Andrew Hamm
Berryhill, the court unanimously held that a Social Security Administration Appeals Council dismissal on timeliness grounds of a request for review after a claimant has had an administrative law judge hearing on the merits qualifies as a “final decision . . . made after a hearing” for purposes of allowing judicial review under 42 U.S.C. [read post]
28 May 2019, 2:08 pm by Mark Walsh
Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit and holds that an appeals council’s dismissal of a Social Security claim on timeliness grounds when the claimant has had an administrative law hearing qualifies as a final decision “made after a hearing” so as to allow judicial review under the Social Security Act. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 3:40 am by Edith Roberts
Berryhill, in which the court held that an administrative judge in a social security disability benefits case can rely on testimony by a vocational expert that an applicant can do “other work,” even if the expert does not provide the data she used to form her opinion. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 3:59 am by Edith Roberts
Berryhill, the court held 6-3 that an administrative judge in a social security disability benefits case can rely on testimony by a vocational expert that an applicant can do “other work,” even if the expert does not provide the data she used to form her opinion. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 6:00 am by Lev Sugarman
.: The Center for Strategic and International Studies will hold an event entitled Mitigating Security Risks to Emerging 5G Networks featuring a keynote from Commissioner of the Federal Communications Commission Jessica Rosenworcel, and a panel including Travis Russell, Chris Boyer, Ambassador Robert Strayer and moderator Clete Johnson. [read post]
5 Dec 2018, 2:15 pm by Amy Howe
Garcia, the state asked the justices to review a decision by the Kansas Supreme Court that reversed Ramiro Garcia’s conviction for identity theft after he used someone else’s Social Security number. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 4:32 pm by INFORRM
” Internet and Social Media The Independent reported an incident which occurred on 12 November 2018 resulted in Google’s internet traffic being run through China and Russia. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 11:21 am by John Elwood
Berryhill, 17-1606, presents a question only a lawyer could love: whether a decision by the Social Security Administration’s “Appeals Council” — the body that hears disability benefits claimants’ appeals from administrative law judge decisions — that the claimant’s appeal was untimely is a “final decision” subject to judicial review. [read post]