Search for: "S & E Contractors, Inc. v. United States" Results 21 - 40 of 304
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2023, 1:45 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Out-of-state employers, insurers, employee benefit plan vendors, and other businesses registered to do business in Pennsylvania, Georgia, Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota, or another state that requires that out-of-state businesses consent to jurisdiction as a condition of their registration to do business in the state face a heightened risk of getting hauled into court in the consent to jurisdiction state following last month’s Supreme Court… [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 11:23 am by Keith Szeliga
The contractors subjective view of the significance of data is not dispositive.[17] The standard has been interpreted broadly. [read post]
26 Mar 2023, 10:07 am
Delle Chiaie both required the cash escrow substitution, while A & E Flooring, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm by admin
Irving’s father, Abraham, was self-employed as a hat manufacturer, doing business later as United Headwear Corporation.[9]  The family had two children, Irving, and his older sister, Gladys. 1930. [read post]
14 Jan 2023, 11:33 am by Editor Charlie
  The Notice states the MLC “does not follow the Office’s rulemaking guidance”[iii] regarding terminations, and that The MLC, Inc. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 2:52 pm by Emily Theriault
Indeed, the numbers of small business government contractors continue to dwindle,[1] which may reflect the perception that the potential risks and burdens of federal contracting (like status protests) outweigh the potential benefits. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 7:59 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division (EEOC v. [read post]
12 May 2022, 6:59 am by Robert Liles
In recent years, Medicaid Fraud Control Units (MFCUs) and various state audit organizations have expanded their enforcement efforts. [read post]
2 May 2022, 2:12 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Emotional distress damages are not recoverable in a private action to enforce the disability discrimination and accommodation requirements of either the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (“Rehab Act”) or the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“ACA”) according to the May 1, 2022 United States Supreme Court ruling in Cummings v. [read post]