Search for: "S S V STATE OF MICHIGAN" Results 21 - 40 of 6,424
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2022, 12:00 am by Howard Friedman
  The complaint (full text) in Planned Parenthood of Michigan v. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 8:06 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here is the opinion: Michigan v SSM CA6 Opinion An excerpt: Because the State is not suing to enjoin a class III gaming activity, but instead a trust submission under MILCSA, § 2710(d)(7)(A)(ii) of IGRA does not abrogate the Tribe’s sovereign immunity, and the district court lacked jurisdiction. [read post]
The order prohibits the AG “and anyone acting under [the AG’s] control and supervision” from enforcing the states abortion ban that was dormant until the overturning of Roe v. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 4:10 am by Howard Friedman
Cl., Dec. 7, 2020), the Michigan Court of Claims "discrimination because of sex under the ELCRA includes discrimination because of an individual’s “gender identity,” and thus Interpretative Statement 2018-1 is valid to that extent....However, feeling itself bound by a prior state Court of Appeals decision, the court held:discrimination because of an individual’s “sexual orientation” is not prohibited under the ELCRA. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 12:43 pm
The state of Louisiana, in its written arguments in Montejo, did not urge the Court to reconsider Michigan v. [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 4:30 am by Timothy P. Flynn
Michigan Attorney General Bill Schuette filed a brief with the United States Supreme Court yesterday laying out Michigan's official position on the constitutional question of whether states can ban same-sex marriage. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 12:25 am
App., Feb. 1, 2007), a Michigan state court of appeals dismissed a challenge by a member of an Islamic religious-charitable-educational organization to the procedures used to replace the organization's trustees who had resigned. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 6:42 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here are the new materials in the case captioned State of Michigan v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 2:45 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Quoting Fletcher: The case is narrowly focused on the states ability to sue under the tribal-state compact — not the merits of the casino question itself, said Matthew Fletcher, director of the Indigenous Law and Policy Center at Michigan State University. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
If substance mattered more than form, then the state courts in Michigan made the right choice, by rejecting the defendant’s claim that the judge’s verdict of acquittal should bar retrial. [read post]
5 Nov 2012, 1:39 pm by The Federalist Society
The question in this case is whether, under the Court’s 1981 decision in Michigan v. [read post]