Search for: "S. D. R.C."
Results 21 - 40
of 294
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jul 2017, 10:24 am
(Supreme Court of Ohio Sides with Taxpayers in Two Recent Real Estate Taxation Decisions)By: Stephen D. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 6:40 am
The trial court overruled Affinity’s motion and found that R.C. 2315.18 does not apply to defamation claims. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 11:42 am
Affinity Medical filed a post-trial motion to have the court apply the cap on noneconomic damages set forth in R.C. 2315.18(B)(2) and the cap on punitive damages in R.C. 2315.21(D) to reduce the jury award. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 6:37 am
Bode, 2015-Ohio-1519 (“[A]n adjudication of delinquency may not be used to enhance the penalty for a later offense under R.C. 4511.19(G)(1)(d) when the adjudication carried the possibility of confinement, the adjudication was uncounseled, and there was no effective waiver of the right to counsel. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 7:29 am
And there’s one dissent. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 6:28 am
The statutory phrase, “transacts business” in R.C. 4117.13(D) is not ambiguous. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 5:33 am
Clinton D. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 11:10 am
., decided Monday) (one paragraph break added): We find the five-year firearm condition/sanction against appellant for a misdemeanor violation of R.C. 2923.15(A) [using a weapon while intoxicated] under these circumstances was unreasonable, overbroad, and an unwarranted implication of his Second Amendment rights. [read post]
29 Nov 2019, 7:56 am
Therefore, the Christman court’s approach to R.C. 2929.19(B)(5) should be applied to R.C. 2941.51(D) and this Court should find that a trial court satisfies its duty to make an ability-to-pay determination under R.C. 2941.51(D) by explicitly stating that it considered a PSI containing information about the offender’s age, health, work history, and education. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 10:16 am
”) D’Amore v. [read post]
1 May 2019, 6:46 am
At issue in the case is whether a dog must be previously designated as a “dangerous dog” under R.C. 955.22 for the dog’s owner to be convicted of a misdemeanor for failure to control a “dangerous dog” under R.C. 955.22(D). [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 10:00 pm
IRS announces revocation of certain R.C. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 8:00 am
R.C. 2901.01(A)(9)(a) and (d) (Defines offenses of violence.) [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 6:38 am
’s Rehabilitation? [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 12:37 am
Based on the foregoing, we conclude that the determination of whether a client list constitutes a trade secret pursuant to R.C. 1333.61(D) does not depend on whether it has been memorized by a former employee. ... [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 6:02 am
R. 54(D) and R.C. 2303.21. [read post]
26 Dec 2019, 10:41 am
Jones was charged with failure to confine a dangerous dog, in violation of R.C. 955.22(D), a fourth-degree misdemeanor. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 10:46 am
At issue in this case is whether a creditor’s failure to present a claim against a decedent’s estate within the six-month statute of limitations of R.C. 2117.06(C) precludes a later action against the decedent’s surviving spouse under Ohio’s necessaries statute, R.C. 3103.03. [read post]
13 May 2016, 6:22 am
This involves the interpretation of R.C. 4141.282 (C) and (D). [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 11:03 am
“It’s déjà vu all over again. [read post]
