Search for: "S. v. D."
Results 21 - 40
of 62,633
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2012, 4:14 am
Regina v Bateman; Regina v Doyle: [2012] EWCA Crim 2158; [2012] WLR (D) 355 “Where an offender was committed to the Crown Court by the magistrates’ court under paragraph 11(2)(a) of Schedule 12 to the Criminal Justice Act 2003 to be dealt with in respect of the commission of an offence committed during the operational period of a suspended sentence imposed by the Crown Court, the Crown Court’s sentencing powers in relation to… [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 7:26 am
KRISTINE D. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 9:21 am
R v S (F) and A(S); [2008] WLR (D) 313 “The key or password to an encrypted computer file was a fact which did not constitute an admission of guilt. [read post]
FRAND Royalty Rates After Ericsson v. D-Link featuring The Honorable Judge James Robart May 15, 2015
27 Mar 2015, 5:24 am
The ABA Section of Antitrust Law’s Intellectual Property Committee and the ABA Section of Intellectual Property Law’s Antitrust Committee Present FRAND Royalty Rates After Ericsson v. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 1:31 am
R v T; R v B; R v C; R v H [2009] EWCA Crim 1035; [2009] WLR (D) 19 “A criminal trial without a jury did not contravene a defendant's right to a fair trial where there was a real danger of jury tampering and proposed measures to prevent such interference did not sufficiently address [...] [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 5:42 am
Par exemple, «E-Verify Self Check» utilise un processus qui vérifie l’identité de la personne qui tente d’exécuter une vérification afin de s’assurer qu’elle est bien la personne qu’elle prétend être pour éviter les fraudes ou les abus. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 6:22 am
Strange v. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
The case of the day is D&D Automation, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 7:50 am
Criminal law — Sufficiency of the evidence — Conspiracy to commit first-degree assault and gun possession by felon Ronald D. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 11:41 am
Keller, appellant, was convicted of that offense following a jury trial, in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 9:36 am
R (Heffernan) v Rent Service; [2008] WLR (D) 279 “Rent officers, in identifying the ‘locality’ under Sch 1, Pt I to the Rent Officers (Housing Benefit Functions) Order 1997, as amended, needed to assemble only enough ‘neighbourhoods’ to satisfy the requirements of para 4(6)(c). [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 12:32 pm
Les organismes à but non lucratif s’attaquent aux grands problèmes : la pauvreté, les inégalités en matière de santé, d’éducation et d’accès au travail, la discrimination The post Vélorution : Démocratiser la pratique du vélo appeared first on The Philanthropist Journal. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 2:04 am
Regina v C(S) [2012] EWCA Crim 6; [2012] WLR (D) 5 “At a retrial of a conspirator about whom the jury at the first trial had been unable to reach a verdict, the Crown would be entitled to tell the jury that it was the prosecution’s case that those who had been acquitted at the first trial were probably involved in the conspiracy and that the jury would be entitled to take into account the acquitted conspirators’ probable role in the importation… [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 9:23 am
Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF; Same v AM; Same v AN; Same v AE [2008] EWCA Civ 1148; [2008] WLR (D) 320 “The Court of Appeal gave guidance on the proper approach to the compatibility with the right to a fair trial in art 6 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms of hearings under s 3(10) of the Prevention of Terrorism Act 2005 to determine whether the Secretary of State for the… [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 4:26 pm
In this article, we will discuss resentencing pursuant to Penal Code 1170(d) in context of the court’s decision in People v. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 4:41 am
County of Jackson (D. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 3:50 pm
See Breona C. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 7:08 am
John D. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 2:14 am
Pankina v Secretary of State for the Home Dept; Malekia v Secretary of State for the Home Dept; Ahmed v Secretary of State for the Home Dept; Junaideen v Secretary of State for the Home Dept; Ali v Secretary of State for the Home Dept; Sankar v Secretary of State for the Home Dept [2010] EWCA Civ 719; [2010] WLR (D) 158 ”The immigration rules could not lawfully incorporate provisions set out in another document which… [read post]
