Search for: "SACK v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE" Results 21 - 40 of 65
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2017, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
This week saw the publication of the Civil Justice statistics for the Royal Courts of Justice 2016. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 1:27 pm by Matthew Kahn
The Justice Department has filed for Supreme Court review of the U.S. [read post]
30 Sep 2017, 5:39 am by Garrett Hinck
Rick Pildes proposed a slightly modified approach to protecting the Special Counsel that would allow judicial review of existing Department of Justice regulations. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 7:30 am by Marissa Miller
 The National Review Online marks Justice Thomas’s twentieth year on the Court with a symposium. [read post]
12 Jun 2021, 1:29 pm by Ajay Sarma, Christiana Wayne
Kurup discussed the Supreme Court’s decision to hear United States v. [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
  It is seeking funding via the Crowd Justice site. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 3:55 am by Peter J. Sluka
Consider the Fourth Department’s in-depth waiver analysis in McGuire v McGuire (covered in this post). [read post]
26 May 2018, 7:19 am by Rachel Bercovitz
Res. 59), featuring testimony by former State Department Legal Adviser John B. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 12:34 pm by Rachel Brown, Wenqing Zhao
The Justice Department has targeted Chinese officials in the past, most notably through the indictment of five People’s Liberation Army officers for cyber espionage in 2015. [read post]
26 May 2010, 6:46 am by Adam Chandler
But the NFL was sacked by the Supreme Court and its 90-year-old senior justice, John Paul Stevens. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 4:00 am by Bob Bauer
By adopting the Justice Department current rules as its own, Congress could resist reviving the independent counsel model while still ensuring, in Pildes’ words, the “integrity and impartiality of investigations…when the Justice Department faces a conflict of interest. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 7:21 am by Nabiha Syed
Yesterday, in Golan v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 7:06 am by Kiran Bhat
As Lyle reported for this blog, yesterday a Fifth Circuit panel ordered the Department of Justice to clarify the Administration’s position on judicial review following the President’s remarks. [read post]
22 Jun 2014, 5:31 pm by INFORRM
  An adjournment was granted for a period of 10 days after Mr Amaral sacked his legal team at the last minute. [read post]