Search for: "SACK v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE"
Results 21 - 40
of 65
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2018, 5:30 am
Notwithstanding the modesty of these proposals, at least some conservative legal scholars have argued that they’d be unconstitutional, pointing to Justice Antonin Scalia’s celebrated dissent in Morrison v. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 6:27 am
Judges Jacobs, Sack, Lohier, and Cabranes wrote concurring opinions, while Judges Lynch and Livingston dissented (Zarda v. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 4:00 am
In the case, the Justice Department and the EEOC had filed amicus briefs taking opposite positions from each other. [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 4:00 am
The New Decision – Abu Gosh v. [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 4:06 pm
It is seeking funding via the Crowd Justice site. [read post]
28 Oct 2017, 9:47 am
Crossover Law EnforcementBrown v. [read post]
28 Oct 2017, 9:47 am
Crossover Law EnforcementBrown v. [read post]
30 Sep 2017, 5:39 am
Rick Pildes proposed a slightly modified approach to protecting the Special Counsel that would allow judicial review of existing Department of Justice regulations. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 4:52 pm
This week saw the publication of the Civil Justice statistics for the Royal Courts of Justice 2016. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 7:00 am
In The Counterinsurgent’s Constitution, Ganesh Sitaraman sees justice and reconciliation as “weapons of war, instruments of lawfare that can be designed to reduce or even eliminate the insurgency. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 1:27 pm
The Justice Department has filed for Supreme Court review of the U.S. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 5:03 pm
Independent News & Media has said that Ireland’s libel laws threaten public interest reporting in a submission to a statutory review being conducted by the Department of Justice. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 6:11 am
Similarly, in Terminiello v. [read post]
28 Feb 2016, 4:09 pm
Surveillance and Information Gathering This week there have been more responses to Apple’s battle with the Department of Justice over whether the maker of the iPhone should write code to help the Department of Justice hack into the San Bernadino shooter’s phone. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 8:31 am
” So concludes the game-changing statutory interpretation opinion of Chief Justice John Roberts in King v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 5:55 am
” So concludes the game-changing statutory interpretation opinion of Chief Justice John Roberts in King v. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 12:39 am
(Sack, J., sitting by designation, concurring in part). [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 4:09 am
Department of Agriculture. [read post]
22 Jun 2014, 5:31 pm
An adjournment was granted for a period of 10 days after Mr Amaral sacked his legal team at the last minute. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 12:46 pm
” In 2000, the Supreme Court of the United States in its decision in Troxel v. [read post]
