Search for: "SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL V US"
Results 21 - 40
of 53
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Sep 2018, 9:01 pm
In the 2005 case of Avery v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 4:17 am
” We rely on our readers to send us links for our round-up. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 8:28 am
Introduction Economists tend to love property taxes; the public is likely to view this as more proof, as if it were needed, of John Maynard Keynes’ observation that economics is extremely useful—as a form of employment for economists. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 4:20 am
” We rely on our readers to send us links for our round-up. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court in Kokesh v. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 4:36 am
For The New York Times, Adam Liptak reports that one of the grants, in Janus v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am
Sierra Club v. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 7:54 am
Municipal Court of City and County of San Francisco, 387 U.S. 523 (1963). [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 3:24 pm
City of Richmond (2010) 182 Cal.App.4th 305 [Municipal Services Agreement between city and tribe contained CEQA compliance clause and was not project approval triggering CEQA review].) [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 6:25 am
The Supreme Court in McCutcheon v. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 12:30 pm
Abbott Saltonstall v. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am
City of San Diego v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:30 pm
One decision, Lotus v. [read post]
Appellate Court Shuts Out Trial Court in CEQA/ESA Double Header under Deferential Standard of Review
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am
Underlying Land Use Approvals and Subsequent Actions. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 8:25 am
Hagman, trustee, v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
Supreme Court in Decker v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 1:25 pm
In Koontz v. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 1:40 pm
No matter how vigorously Koontz’s lawyer, Sacramento attorney Paul J. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 6:45 am
(County of Sonoma v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 5:39 am
To Sacramento! [read post]
