Search for: "SCALES v. STATE"
Results 21 - 40
of 4,886
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Aug 2006, 9:20 pm
Oddly enough, Johnson v. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 4:52 pm
Here, in Stoetzl v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 3:55 pm
Trump v. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 4:44 pm
Unfortunately, the FBS scale was not a “new” scale with “new” items, but borrowed items from other scales that measure real disturbances such as cognitive dysfunction.14 In a recent newspaper article discussing issues surrounding the manner with which tests/scales were adopted, University of Minnesota officials stated they were willing to let the marketplace decide”.15 As one might… [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 10:33 am
Lochner v. [read post]
27 May 2021, 5:11 pm
The post United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s 2022 decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 6:31 pm
Blue called in sick today, causing another delay in the case of State v. [read post]
26 Aug 2023, 9:13 am
Alphabet LinkedIn Isn’t a State Actor–Perez v. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 2:45 am
On appeal from: [2012] EWCA Crim 67 The appellant was under investigation for involvement in a large-scale ‘boiler-room’ fraud. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 1:27 pm
For example, the court mentions Chavez v. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 9:08 am
Unfortunately, the FBS scale was not a “new” scale with “new” items, but borrowed items from other scales that measure real disturbances such as cognitive dysfunction.14 In a recent newspaper article discussing issues surrounding the manner with which tests/scales were adopted, University of Minnesota officials stated they were willing to let the marketplace decide”.15 As one might… [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 11:19 am
By Jason Rantanen Mettler-Toledo, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2021, 10:15 am
The notice cited the Karnataka High Court’s decision in Virendra Khanna v State of Karnataka, wherein the court held that searches of mobile phones require a judicial warrant unless there is an ongoing investigation and there are documented reasons to justify such intervention. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 4:29 pm
To be sure, the purpose of the IFR is to seek to comply with a 2021 Supreme Court decision, United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 6:12 am
State v. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 8:03 am
Code § 3344) and common law (White v. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 8:03 am
Code § 3344) and common law (White v. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 6:15 am
In Bristol-Myers Squibb Company v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 10:26 am
Arizona V. [read post]
