Search for: "SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORPORATION" Results 21 - 30 of 30
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Oct 2010, 11:15 am by fraudfighters
” Plaintiff Daniel Kirk is a Vietnam War veteran and former employee of Defendant Schindler Elevator Corporation. [read post]
2 Oct 2010, 11:02 am by Oliver G. Randl
In support of its arguments, it filed the following documents:OT1: Nullity lawsuit filed in Milan on 30 November 2006 by inter alia opponent 2 against the patent proprietor) + OT1a: translation of OT1; OT2: Order from Zaragoza Commercial Court dated 21 September 2007 in respect of “Preliminary Findings” regarding a complaint filed by the patent proprietor against opponent 2 + OT2a: Translation of OT2; OT3: Nullity lawsuit dated 13 November 2007 filed by opponent 2 against Otis… [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 8:28 am by Anna Christensen
§ 157(b)(2)(C) contravenes congressional intent; (2) whether Congress may authorize core jurisdiction over debtors’ compulsory counterclaims to proofs of claim; and (3) whether the Ninth Circuit contravened Supreme Court precedent and created a circuit split by holding that Congress cannot constitutionally authorize non-Article III bankruptcy judges to enter final judgment on all compulsory counterclaims to proofs of claim.Certiorari-Stage Documents:Opinion below (9th Circuit)Petition for… [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 7:26 am by Lyle Denniston
Tinklenberg (09-1498), asking the Court to clarify how to count the days that are allowed to lapse before an individual charged with a federal crime must be put on trial, or have the charges dismissed; and Schindler Elevator Co. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 12:19 pm by Thornhill Law Firm, APLC
In our recent case of Edward Charles Washington and Travis Parker versus Aetna Life Insurance d/b/a One Canal Place, Schindler Elevator Corporation, Corporate Realty Advisors, and Zurich Insurance Company, Docket Number 01-9541-C of the Civil District Court of the City of New Orleans, all of the issues with respect to the potential modification of the video tape surveillance evidence was presented to us for defending. [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 3:06 pm
Otis, KONE, Schindler and ThyssenKrupp [corporate websites] were fined €992 million for [read post]