Search for: "SEC v. John Black" Results 21 - 40 of 82
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 May 2021, 8:49 am by fjhinojosa
Ballentine, Discussing Privacy in sec Subpoena Practice After Carpenter v. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 3:03 am by Liz Dunshee
The charges show that the SEC views talking down analyst estimates as a problem under Reg FD. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 4:06 am by rainey Reitman
(Pamela Samuelson’s Commentary on UMG v Augusto and Vernor v Autodesk) Vernor v Autodesk (EFF Amicus Brief in Key Case re First Sale and Contracts, Following UMG v Augusto) MDY v Blizzard (Justia) A Mixed Ninth Circuit Ruling in MDY v Blizzard: WoW Buyers Are Not Owners – But Glider Users Are not Copyright Infringers (EFF’s Commentary on MDY v Blizzard) Capitol Records v ReDigi (Wikipedia) Court’s… [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 2:12 pm by Peter Margulies
This principle, first announced by the Supreme Court in 1943's SEC v. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 6:12 am
Rouhandeh, and Michael Kaplan, Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, on Saturday, April 13, 2019 Tags: Bonds, Corporate fraud, DOJ, International governance, Misconduct, Rule 144, SECSEC enforcement, Securities litigation, Securities regulation, Volkswagen 2019 Proposed Amendments to DGCL Posted by John Mark Zeberkiewicz and Brigitte Fresco, Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., on Saturday, April 13, 2019 … [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 10:32 am by admin
Representative John Bingham of Ohio offered a new draft: The Congress shall have power to make all laws which shall be necessary and proper to secure to the citizens of each state all privileges and minutes of citizens in the several states (Art. 4 Sec 2) 31; and to all persons in the several States equal protection in the rights to life, liberty, and property (5th Amend.).32 While Bingham’s draft directly cited the Constitution, the committee minutes indicate that it decided… [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 2:58 am by Walter Olson
Henning, New York Times DealBook; Lorenzo v. [read post]
7 May 2018, 3:52 am by INFORRM
The SEC has published a statement on the exposure of public sector companies to cyber security risks and imposed a $35m penalty to investment company Altaba Inc. [read post]