Search for: "SECURITIES ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION v. Brown" Results 21 - 40 of 151
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Sep 2009, 4:00 am
Robert Brown, Poison Puts, Shareholder Voting Rights and the Need forn Even Stronger Shareholder Bill of Rights: San Antonio Fire & Police v. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 11:27 am by Blog Editorial
Judgments outstanding The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. and another v Berliner Verkehrsbetriebe (BVG) Anstalt des Oeffentlichen Rechts, heard 11 November 2010 Al Rawi and others (Respondents) v The Security Service and others (Appellants), heard 24 -27 January 2011 Home Office (Appellant) v Tariq (Respondent), heard 24 – 27 January 2011 Perpetual Trustee Company Limited v BNY Corporate… [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 11:05 am by Andrew Pincus
” And the government’s legal position, if accepted by the Supreme Court, would greatly facilitate corporate espionage. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 10:55 pm
Plaintiffs-appellants represent a class of investors who purchased securities of Dana Corporation ("Dana") between April 21, 2004 and October 7, 2005 (the "Class Period"). [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 8:42 am by Shannon O'Hare
 Although the market is exploring alternative solutions, lenders under a Spanish syndicated loan always accept the security interest before a Spanish notary in order to take the benefit of such security. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 11:14 pm by Eugene Volokh
(I’ll turn to the corporation question in the next post.) [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 4:31 am by Shannon O'Hare
If the security interests are on properties or rights not located in Venezuela, the creation, perfection and enforcement of the security interests is not governed by the laws of Venezuela, regardless of whether the borrower and/or owner of the secured properties or rights is an individual or corporate legal entity domiciled in Venezuela. [read post]