Search for: "SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. WHITE et al" Results 21 - 40 of 50
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm by Kevin LaCroix
For example, the Securities and Exchange Commission and the New York Department of Financial Services have both announced their intentions to hold directors and officers to a responsible standard when it comes to preventing and responding to cybersecurity incidents. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm by Kevin LaCroix
For example, the Securities and Exchange Commission and the New York Department of Financial Services have both announced their intentions to hold directors and officers to a responsible standard when it comes to preventing and responding to cybersecurity incidents. [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 5:32 pm by Wolfgang Demino
  SHARON EUL et al., on behalf of themselves and a class, Plaintiffs,v.TRANSWORLD SYSTEMS et al., Defendants.No. 15 C 7755.United States District Court, N.D. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 8:46 am by Quinta Jurecic
The text of the order is available below and on the White House website. [read post]
19 May 2016, 2:33 pm by Kevin LaCroix
As Chair White noted, for as many companies that are monumental successes, there are a far greater number of failures. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm by John Dean
Halliburton Company, et al., No. 1:05-CV-1276 (D.D.C. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 8:43 am
This article updates and includes references to the previously published "SunTRUST or UNTRUSTWORTHY For SEC Chair Mary Jo White" (BrokeAndBroker.com, April 14, 2013).Molchatsky In-Discretion  In Molchatsky, et al. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 6:40 am by D. Daxton White
The Order is based on the entry of a permanent injunction against Rizvi in the civil action entitled Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 7:53 pm by Matthew Bush
Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust FundsDocket: 11-1085Issue(s): (1) Whether, in a misrepresentation case under Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 10b-5, the district court must require proof of materiality before certifying a plaintiff class based on the fraud-on-the-market theory; and (2) whether, in such a case, the district court must allow the defendant to present evidence rebutting the applicability of the fraud-on-the-market theory before certifying a… [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 7:12 am by Steve Szentesi
Steel Investment Canada Case On November 24, 2011, the Supreme Court of Canada denied leave in United States Steel Corporation et al. v. [read post]
25 Dec 2011, 11:54 am by admin
Steel Investment Canada Case On November 24, 2011, the Supreme Court of Canada denied leave in United States Steel Corporation et al. v. [read post]
15 May 2011, 9:43 am
Juan Romagoza, CJA's lead plaintiff in Romagoza et. al. v. [read post]
15 May 2011, 2:00 am
Juan Romagoza, CJA's lead plaintiff in Romagoza et. al. v. [read post]