Search for: "SHARPE v. EPA "
Results 21 - 40
of 57
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 May 2019, 9:05 pm
Department of Education, EPA, U.S. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 4:04 am
In Stokeling v. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 10:45 am
Its aim was to add technical specificity to Justice Kennedy’s “significant nexus” test set forth in Rapanos v. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 2:31 pm
Sharp a three-judge panel struck down a Delaware law requiring differential prevailing wages as violating the Commerce Clause. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 8:42 am
EPA and U.S. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 9:34 am
Supreme Court decision, Rapanos v. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 5:41 am
Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 5:30 am
EPA claims the first version is the correct one.Prior to King v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 3:57 pm
EPA and Obergefell v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 3:57 pm
EPA and Obergefell v. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 9:45 am
EPA and UARG v. [read post]
2 May 2014, 8:54 am
When Justice Antonin Scalia was accused of making an “unprecedented” error in his EPA v. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 12:22 pm
It is thus well settled, as Chief Justice Marshall explained in Wayman v. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 2:59 pm
What the Court did take on was a sharp new controversy over a policy that EPA has been following for thirty-three years, even before global warming was thought to be a problem. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 1:25 pm
Circuit, Case No. 11-1302, EME Homer City Generation, L.P v. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 1:20 pm
Moreover, in sharp distinction with cellulosic biofuel, there appears to be no great obstacle to the production of advanced biofuel generally; to the extent that estimates in the record are relatively low, that seems to be based on want of a market, which of course continued pressure will tend to solve." [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 8:05 am
In the Proposition 8 case, Hollingsworth v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 5:35 am
Supreme Court’s 2007 decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 1:44 pm
S. 159 (2001); and Rapanos v. [read post]
