Search for: "SHEARS v. STATE" Results 21 - 40 of 168
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jul 2018, 5:32 am by Andrew Hamm
” Michael Shear and Maggie Haberman have the story for the New York Times. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 5:21 am by Andrew Hamm
” Heather Long for the Washington Post reports that Collins “said Sunday she would not vote for any judge who wanted to end access to abortion in the United States by overturning Roe v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
Commentary on Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 12:23 pm by Mark Walsh
In the center section of the public gallery, Illinois state worker Mark Janus is here, awaiting a decision in Janus v. [read post]
12 May 2018, 8:21 am by Larry
Supreme Court decision called Riley v. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 1:03 pm
Here's Mark Walsh at SCOTUSblog reporting on the big oral argument on the last day of the 2017 Term — Trump v. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 4:23 am by Edith Roberts
The first is United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2018, 7:31 am
  Carr J stated in respect of this argument he would have concluded that the "shear variant" produced substantially the same result in the same way and obviously so as the patent states it is the preferred arrangement. [read post]
17 Feb 2018, 7:30 am
”Henry loved when he was in "shear mode"Claim "Interpretation"  - it is all about what you say and disclaimWith the old "Construction" heading now replaced with "Interpretation", Mr Justice Carr stated he would be applying"principles concerning normal interpretation and equivalents set out by the Supreme Court in Actavis v Eli Lilly [2017] UKSC 48, [2018] and by the Patents Court in Mylan v Yeda [2017] EWHC… [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 4:24 am by Edith Roberts
” At National Review, Carrie Severino calls Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 4:43 am by Edith Roberts
” Counting to 5 (podcast) features a discussion of Epic Systems v. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 4:14 am by Edith Roberts
” At Bloomberg, Greg Stohr reports that Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 3:31 am by Jelle Hoekstra
In this respect the respondents submitted two questions of law and requested that if neither the case was remitted to the Opposition Division, nor the requested corrections were allowed, they be referred to the Enlarged Board of Appeal.The following document, related to inventive step over the combination of the teachings of documents D1 and D2, was also submitted:R15: Saint Gobain v Fusion Provida Ltd, Case No: A3/2004/2441.VI. [read post]
  Farmers, like other business owners, may deduct “ordinary and necessary expenses paid . . . in carrying on any trade or business. [read post]