Search for: "SHERWIN WILLIAMS PAINTS" Results 21 - 40 of 112
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Nov 2017, 11:18 pm by Jon Gelman
 The trial court ruled that Sherwin-Williams, NL, and ConAgra are liable for cleaning up the hazard they created, and they appealed. [read post]
The Ashtabula plant was built for Sherwin-Williams, subject to a fifteen-year confidentiality agreement effective through the plant’s sale in the 1970s. [read post]
10 May 2017, 6:05 am by Martha Engel
 Can’t Sherwin Williams deftly shift this from “Cover the Earth with-all-of-this-toxic-paint-that-we’ve-spilt” to something like “Cover the Earth…With Color” while maintaining rights in the logo? [read post]
2 May 2017, 6:25 am by Phyllis H. Marcus
NAD Finds Sherwin-Williams Claims Don’t Require Substantiation In a challenge brought by Rust-Oleum Corporation, the NAD concluded that Sherwin Williams’s ads for its “CoverMaxx” spray paints did not require substantiation because they did not communicate a message of superior paint coverage. [read post]
NAD Finds Sherwin-Williams Claims Don’t Require Substantiation In a challenge brought by Rust-Oleum Corporation, the NAD concluded that Sherwin Williams’s ads for its “CoverMaxx” spray paints did not require substantiation because they did not communicate a message of superior paint coverage. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 6:29 am by Sean Gallagher
One woman who applied for a job at the paint manufacturer Sherwin-Williams through the site of ZipRecruiter received an e-mail shortly afterward from someone posing as the CEO of the company. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 3:30 am by Steve Brachmann
Patients who may be susceptible to any bacterial infections of this type will be able to breathe a great sigh of relief thanks to a new paint formula developed by Sherwin-Williams Co. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 7:38 am by Duets Guest Blogger
The logo was used continuously until 1974 when it was replaced by the logo below, which was meant to portray Sherwin-Williams as “more than a paint store. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 6:00 am by The Dear Rich Staff
For example, if the new products reflect poorly on the brand or if they trigger product liability issues -- for example, a chair made from Sherwin-Williams paint cans -- the owner may have a gripe that consumers will be confused or harmed. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 4:57 pm
In California, a landmark case was decided in December 2013 in which a California Superior Court judge in San Jose ruled that three major current or former paint companies – Sherwin-Williams Co., NL Industries Inc. and ConAgra Grocery Products Co. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 1:59 pm by Jon Gelman
[Click here to see the rest of this post]Found onRelated articlesBuffalo attorney had key role in lead-paint ruling (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)Lots of data to process for Calif. lead paint judge (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)How the Paint Industry Escapes Responsibility for Lead Poisoning (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)Plaintiffs' expert in lead paint trial says industry took responsibility for public health… [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
This post is only from the Reed Smith (more properly, the non-Dechert) side of the blog.One hundred what, you say? [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 8:31 am by Rebecca Tushnet
This Sherwin Williams T-shirt uses a logo that seems awfully familiar .... [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 9:42 am by Jon Gelman
Children today and future generations will be protected from lead poisoning because of it,” Fitzpatrick said.She has worked on the case for the South Carolina-based law firm Motley Rice for the past 13 years.In the bench trial, Kleinberg found Sherwin-Williams Co., NL Industries and ConAgra Grocery Products Co. guilty of creating a public nuisance by manufacturing and selling lead paint long after... [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 4:22 pm by Jon Gelman
Kleinberg ruled that ConAgra, NL Industries and Sherwin-Williams had exposed children to a known poison for decades when they sold lead-based paint for use in homes before it was outlawed in 1977 and created a “public nuisance” by their actions. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm by Jon Gelman
The $1.1 billion fine levied against Sherwin-Williams, ConAgra and NL Industries will be used to help remove the paint from an estimated 4.7 million California homes. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 3:09 am by Jon Gelman
Kleinberg found three companies—Sherwin-Williams Co., NL Industries, Inc., and ConAgra Grocery Products Co. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 10:21 pm by Jon Gelman
Kleinberg ruled that ConAgra, NL Industries and Sherwin-Williams created a “public nuisance” by selling lead-based paint for decades before it was banned in 1978, finding them liable for exposing children to a known poison.The opinion set aside $605 million, or 55% of the judgment, to pay for lead removal in Los Angeles County. [read post]