Search for: "SMITH & WESSON CORPORATION" Results 21 - 32 of 32
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jul 2011, 11:08 pm by Marie Louise
Siemens (Green Patent Blog) Smith & Wesson – ALJ Rogers sets target date in Certain Muzzle-Loading Firearms (337-TA-777) (ITC Law Blog) Wham-O – FLFMC v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 4:27 am by Marie Louise
(Chicago IP Litigation) SimpleAir – E D Texas denies motion to transfer: SimpleAir v AWS Convergence (EDTexweblog.com) Smith & Wesson Corp. [read post]
23 May 2011, 2:20 am by Kelly
Advising inventors, their spouses, and their start-up companies: James Joyce v Armstrong Teasdale (Patently-O) District Court N D California: Use of patent reexamination evidence in parallel litigation: Volterra Semiconductor Corporation v Primarion Inc (Patents Post-Grant) District Court E D California: Government’s approval of false marking settlement precludes later challenge that settlement was “staged” and therefore lacks preclusive effect: Champion Laboratories, Inc… [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 3:38 pm by Ashby Jones
Weapons maker Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation disclosed on Thursday that it is under investigation by the DOJ for potential Foreign Corrupt Practices Act violations. [read post]
10 Jan 2010, 2:22 pm by Joseph C. McDaniel
List "Smith and Wesson .38 hammerless snubnose revolver, stainless, 20 years old, value $350", or whatever else is a correct description. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 5:01 pm by Robinson, Calcagnie & Robinson
Smith & Wesson Arms Co. (1959) 53 Cal.2d 77, 346 P.2d 409, that makes service on the California representative of a foreign parent valid-that is, valid as to the foreign parent-under California law. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 9:42 am
Today the COA has issued its ruling, notable in part for the 3 pages of names lined up on the side of Smith & Wesson: In Smith and Wesson Corporation, et al v. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 4:11 am
This week's oral arguments before the Court of Appeals that will be webcast: This Monday, Oct. 1st: 10:00 AM - Smith and Wesson Corporation, et al v. [read post]
15 Sep 2007, 5:04 pm
"The only thing you can truly erase these things with is a specialty Smith & Wesson product," he said. [read post]
3 May 2007, 10:20 am
We were impressed by the number of links and other favorable attention that followed our post here about barring municipalities from hiring outside contingent fee counsel in nuisance actions brought against product manufacturers. [read post]