Search for: "SMITH v. LEAHY" Results 21 - 40 of 298
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Aug 2018, 5:15 pm by Dennis Crouch
Lamar Smith (Namesake of the Leahy-Smith Act) and the Intellectual Property Owners Ass’n. [read post]
11 Nov 2021, 9:44 pm by Patent Docs
Noonan -- The inter partes review (IPR) provisions of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act have been castigated by many for the propensity of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) to find claims challenged in these proceedings to be anticipated or obvious (albeit this outcome has been less frequent for technologies in chemical and life sciences patents). [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 3:00 pm by Aurora Barnes
The petition of the day is: Return Mail Inc. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2016, 9:15 pm by Patent Docs
Federal Circuit Denies Petition for Rehearing in Medtronic v. [read post]
19 May 2015, 9:59 pm by Patent Docs
§ 146 pursuant to changes in the statute provided by the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, in Biogen MA, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 9:16 pm by Patent Docs
Because Enzo raised the issue du jour, that subjecting a patent granted prior to enactment of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA) to inter partes review (IPR) was unconstitutional, the U.S. government joined the appeal to defend the constitutionality of PTAB proceedings under these circumstances. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 9:59 pm by Patent Docs
The opinion (or rather the description of the Board's procedures and the history of how the Board arrived at its decision) once again illustrates the flaws in the IPR system established under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act of 2012. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 8:19 pm by Patent Docs
Postal Service, which presented the simple question whether the federal government is a "person" entitled to petition for post-grant review under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act ("AIA"). [read post]
23 Mar 2021, 8:49 pm by Patent Docs
Noonan -- Ever since institution of the post-grant review proceedings enacted under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act were implemented by the U.S. [read post]
29 May 2018, 9:22 am by Patent Docs
Patent and Trademark Office Patent Trial and Appeal Board's implementation of inter partes review as provided by the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (codified at 35 U.S.C. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 9:44 pm by Patent Docs
Patent and Trademark Office in implementing portions of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act or 2012 violates the Constitution by permitting a non-Article III court to deprive patentees of property rights, in Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. [read post]
7 Jan 2024, 9:59 pm by Patent Docs
Noonan -- One of the many changes introduced into U.S. patent law by the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act were provisions for post-grant review (PGR) and inter partes review (IPR). [read post]
7 May 2018, 8:11 pm by Patent Docs
(Interference practice was abolished, to the joy of many, with passage of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act in 2012.) [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 10:55 am by Steve Brachmann
Supreme Court issued its decision in Return Mail, Inc. v. [read post]