Search for: "SPENCER v. ARNOLD."
Results 21 - 32
of 32
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Nov 2009, 9:36 am
Interflora British Unit v Marks and Spencer PLC Flowers Direct Online Limited [2009] EWHC 1095 (Ch), Mr Justice Arnold (High Court, England and Wales) felt it appropriate to refer a number of questions to the European Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling on the legality of the purchase and use of words including a third party's trade mark as a keyword (see earlier IPKat post here). [read post]
21 May 2010, 3:19 am
Before I consider why in detail – and both because EU trade mark law is currently being reviewed by the Max Planck Institute at the request of the Commission and the Commission itself considers that the Court should reconsider its opinion in the instant very case (see [18] of Interflora v Marks & Spencers No. 2, [2010] EWHC 925 (Ch) [noted by the IPKat here] per Arnold J – I wish to say why I regret those answers.8. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 1:05 am
Supreme Court's Lewis v. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 10:00 pm
Mass. 2000); Spencer v. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 10:03 am
The Court’s reluctance last year to interfere with parties’ freedom of contract is also apparent in the contractual interpretation case of Arnold v Britton & Ors [2015] UKSC 36 (Case Comment here). [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 6:56 am
Case law The Spencer v. [read post]
24 Nov 2008, 12:04 pm
Garten of Arnold & Porter in Washington and Thomas H. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 12:28 am
The main residence of Veraton, circa 1907. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 7:53 am
Arnold, 98 N.Y.2d at 67, 745 N.Y.S.2d 782, 772 N.E.2d 1140; see People v. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 4:20 am
In American Pipe & Construction Co. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:42 pm
Colyer, Arnold W. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:28 am
Session 2: Establishing the Features of the Consumer The UK courts have in recent years been quite explicit that the consumer is a normative construct, a fiction, and a benchmark. [read post]
