Search for: "SPENCER v. ARNOLD."
Results 21 - 32
of 32
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Dec 2010, 6:56 am
Case law The Spencer v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 1:05 am
Supreme Court's Lewis v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 6:32 am
See American Bar Association v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 3:19 am
Before I consider why in detail – and both because EU trade mark law is currently being reviewed by the Max Planck Institute at the request of the Commission and the Commission itself considers that the Court should reconsider its opinion in the instant very case (see [18] of Interflora v Marks & Spencers No. 2, [2010] EWHC 925 (Ch) [noted by the IPKat here] per Arnold J – I wish to say why I regret those answers.8. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 7:24 am
"Arnold J however qualified question 3(b) as follows, at para. 20: "... [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 9:36 am
Interflora British Unit v Marks and Spencer PLC Flowers Direct Online Limited [2009] EWHC 1095 (Ch), Mr Justice Arnold (High Court, England and Wales) felt it appropriate to refer a number of questions to the European Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling on the legality of the purchase and use of words including a third party's trade mark as a keyword (see earlier IPKat post here). [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 7:13 am
To his acute embarrassment, the IPKat has only just, and rather belatedly, got round to reviewing the fourth edition of Performers' Rights by Richard Arnold (now Mr Justice Arnold, of the Patents Court for England and Wales). [read post]
22 May 2009, 5:00 am
Interflora British Unit v Marks and Spencer PLC Flowers Direct Online Limited, [2009] EWHC 1095 (Ch). [read post]
6 May 2009, 7:26 pm
In addition to the congressional speakers, NSSTA's educational program featured exceptional structured settlement and settlement planning presentations: Industry Update and Looking Forward - Transitioning NSSTA Presidents Chris Diamantis and Dan Durbin offered their strategic analyses; "All Things Considered" - NSSTA's legal committee has upgraded the quality and scope of its educational contributions: Michael Miller summarized Spencer v. [read post]
24 Nov 2008, 12:04 pm
Garten of Arnold & Porter in Washington and Thomas H. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 10:00 pm
Mass. 2000); Spencer v. [read post]
10 Nov 2006, 3:01 am
They are:Case T-278/04 Jabones Pardo v OHIM - Quimi Romar (YUKI). [read post]
